Comparison of fluconazole release from hydrogels with Syntalen MP and Syntalen KP and from hydrophilic cream

Authors

  • Katarzyna Wojciechowska Chair and Department of Applied Pharmacy, Medical University of Lublin, Poland Author
  • Maria Zuń Chair and Department of Applied Pharmacy, Medical University of Lublin, Poland Author
  • Dorota Dwornicka Chair and Department of Applied Pharmacy, Medical University of Lublin, Poland Author
  • Dorota Kowalczuk Chair and Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Medical University of Lublin, Poland Author
  • Ewa Poleszak Chair and Department of Applied Pharmacy, Medical University of Lublin, Poland Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12923/j.2084-980X/26.2/a.15

Keywords:

fluconazole release, hydrogels, hydrophilic cream, rheology

Abstract

Fluconazole is popular antifungal medicine, usually used per os in Candida spp. infections of the skin and mucous membranes, pityriasis versicolor, candidiasis organs, and also in the prophylaxis of fungal infections in patients with cancer and AIDS. There are attempts of formulation of the different forms of drug because of many side effects of fluconazole in oral administration. These are eye drops, injections and semisolid skin preparations. Thus, the aim of the study was preparing two hydrogels with Syntalen MP and Syntalen KP and hydrophilic cream, containing 1% of fluconazole and comparing the release of the substance from obtained preparations. At the beginning, gels and hydrophilic cream have been subjected to physical tests such as: slip and spreadability. Further, their rheological properties were evaluated. In the slip and spreadability tests, the cream had the best parameters, the rheological tests showed pseudoplastic character of flowing of gels and plastic flowing of the cream. All these three preparations showed the thixotropy. The release studies, conducted using the extracting chamber (according to FP IX) in Paddle Apparatus showed that the amount of released substance from gels is about two times bigger than from the cream, but the releasing from the gel with Syntalen MP is slightly better than from the gel with Syntalen KP.

References

1. Abdel-Mottaleb M.M.A. et al.: Preparation and evaluation of fluconazole gels. Egypt. J. Biomed. Sci., 23, 2007.

2. Achim M. et al.: Topical dosage forms containing fluidextract of ruscus aculeatus: Formulation, preparation and physical characterization. Clujul Medical, 83, 99-103, 2010.

3. Ayub A.C. et al.: Topical delivery of fluconazole: In vitro skin penetration and permeation using emulsions as dosage forms. Drug Dev.Ind. Pharm., 33, 273-280, 2010.

4. Basha B.N., Prakasam K., Goli D.: Formulation and evaluation of gel containing fluconazole – antifungial agent. Int. J. Drug Res., 3, 109-128, 2011.

5. Bonacucina G., Martelli S., Palmieri G.F.: Rheological, mucoadhesive and release properties of Carbopol gels in hydrophilic cosolvents. Int. J. Pharm., 282, 115-130, 2004.

6. Bonferoni M.C., et al.: A modifies Franz diffusion cell for simultaneous assessment drug release and washability of mucoadhesive gels. Pharm. Dev. Technol., 4, 45-53,1999.

7. Bottari F.: Influence of drug concentration on in vitro release of salicylic acid from ointment bases. J. Pharm. Sci., 63, 1979-1983, 1974.

8. Charlier C. et al: Fluconazole for the management of invasive candidiasis: where do we after 15 years? J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 57, 384-410, 2006.

9. Fiebieg A., Janicki St., Sznitowska M.: Farmacja stosowana. PZWL Warszawa 2004.

10. Gaikwad V. et al.: Effect of Carbopol 934 and 949 on fluconazole release from topical gel formulation: A factorial approach. Curr. Pharm. Res., 2, 487-493, 2012.

11. Islam M.T. et al: Rheological characterization of topical Carbomer gels neutralized to different pH. Pharm. Res., 7, 1192-1199, 2004.

12. Jimenez - Soriano M.M., Fresno- Contreras M.J., Selles F.: Development of a cream from a self-emulsifying base and moisturizing actives. II Farmaco, 56, 513-522, 2001.

13. Martin M.V.: The use of fluconazole and itraconazole in the treatment of Candida albicans infections: a review. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 44, 429-437, 1999.

14. Mathy F.X. et al: Fluconazole distribution in rat dermis following intravenous and topical application: A microdialysis study. J. Pharm. Sci., 4, 770-780, 2005.

15. Mitkari B.V. et al: Formulation and evaluation of topical liposomal gel for fluconazole. Indian J. Pharm. Educ. Res., 4, 324-333, 2010.

16. Nagoroje S. et al: Formulation and evaluation of ophthalmic delivery of fluconazole from ion activated in situ gelling system. Der Pharmacie Lettre, 4, 1228-1235, 2012.

17. Pluta J. Koralewicz B.: Hydrożele, właściwości I zastosowanie w technologii postaci leku. I. Charakterystyka hydrożeli. Polym.Med., 34, 3-13, 2004.

18. Polska Farmakopea IX, Urząd Rejestracji Produktów Leczniczych, Wyrobów Medycznych i Produktów Biobójczych. Warszawa, 2011.

19. Sadasivudu P., Shastri N., Sadanandam M.: Development and validation of RP-HPLC and UV methods of analysis for fluconazole in pharmaceutical solid dosage forms. Int. J. Chem. Tech. Res., 1(4), 1131-1136, 2009.

Downloads

Published

2013-05-01

How to Cite

Wojciechowska, K., Zuń, M., Dwornicka, D., Kowalczuk, D., & Poleszak, E. (2013). Comparison of fluconazole release from hydrogels with Syntalen MP and Syntalen KP and from hydrophilic cream. Current Issues in Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, 26(2), 189-192. https://doi.org/10.12923/j.2084-980X/26.2/a.15