Assessment of risk perception of patients concerning adverse drug reactions
PDF

Keywords

adverse drug reactions
risk perception
pharmacovigilance system
ADR reporting

Abstract

Introduction. The use of medicines involves trade-offs between their therapeutic benefits and inherent risks. Several studies show that numerous adverse drug reactions (ADRs) could be avoided by increasing patients’ awareness of medicine’s risks. Even though drug labels enclose relevant information about risks and benefits, this information often requires patient education and overall health literacy to improve medication adherence, thereby preventing ADR frequency.

Aim. To describe patient awareness of ADR risks and the Portuguese Pharmacovigilance System.Methods.A questionnaire comprising 27 questions was conducted at a health centre in Coimbra, Portugal. This study included ninety-one patients. Risk perception was scored as positive (≥2.5 points) or negative (<2.5 points). Results were analysed by SPSS v 27.0.

Results. This work highlights poor patient perceptions of risk with a rate of negative responses of 85,7%. Although some responders were aware of the possibility of reporting ADRs, only some participants were familiar with the Portuguese Pharmacovigilance System. Additionally, only five patients – out of the vast majority of those who had previously encountered ADRs – reported the event to INFARMED.

Conclusion. Patient low literacy regarding ADRs and the national reporting systems need to be urgently improved. Patient-centred communication strategies for recognising regulatory requirements and standards of product safety are important measures to achieve effective awareness through routine reporting within the Pharmacovigilance systems.

PDF

References

1. EC. Directive 2010/84/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2010 amending, as regards pharmaco-vigilance. Directive 2001/83/EC on the Community code relating to medicinalproducts for human us. [http://eur-lex. europa. eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ; 2010]

2. World Health Organization. The importance of pharmacovigilance: safety monitoring of medicinal products. Geneva: WHO; 2002:1-48.

3. Vilhelmsson A, Svensson T, Meeuwisse A, Carlsten A. Experiences from consumer reports on psychiatric adverse drug reactions with antidepressant medication: a qualitative study of reports to a consumer association. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2012;13(1):19.

4. Herdeiro MT, Ferreira M, Ribeiro-Vaz I, Polónia JJ, Costa Pereira A. O Sistema Português de Farmacovigilância. Acta Med Port. 2012; 25(4).

5. Matos C, van Hunsel F, Joaquim J. Are consumers ready to take part in the Pharmacovigilance System? - a Portuguese preliminary study concerning ADR reporting. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;883-90.

6. Matos C, Rodrigues L, Joaquim J. Attitudes and opinions of Portuguese community pharmacy professionals towards patient reporting of adverse drug reactions and the pharmacovigilance system. Drugs Ther Perspect. 2017;33(4).

7. Matos C, Joaquim J, Pires T. Attitudes and knowledge of community pharmacy professionals regarding the spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions: a preliminary study in Coimbra, Portugal. Drugs Ther Perspect. 2017;33(2).

8. Vallano A, Cereza G, Pedròs C, Agusti A, Danés I, Aguilera C, et al. Obstacles and solutions for spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions in the hospital. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005;60(6):653-8.

9. Alomar MJ. Factors affecting the development of adverse drug reactions. Saudi Pharm J. 2014;22(2):83-94.

10. Aronson JK. Risk perception in drug therapy. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2006;62(2):135-7.

11. Alshakka MA, Ibrahim MIM, Hassali MAA. Do Health Professionals have Positive Perception Towards Consumer Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions? J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2013;7(10):2181-5.

12. Knapp P, Raynor DK, Berry DC. Comparison of two methods of presenting risk information to patients about the side effects of medicines. Qual Saf Heal Care. 2004;13(3):176-80.

13. Paling J. Strategies to help patients understand risks. Br Med J. 2003;327(7417):745.

14. Fukuda Y, Ando S, Saito M. Risk awareness, medication adherence, and driving behavior as determined by the provision of drug information to patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2020;103(8):1574-80.

15. Britten N. Medication errors: the role of the patient. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;67(6):646-50.

16. Shrank WH, Avorn J. Educating patients about their medications: the potential and limitations of written drug information. Health Aff. 2007;26(3):731-40.

17. Basch E. The missing voice of patients in drug-safety reporting. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(10):865-9.

18. Chinchilla K, Matos C, Hall V, van Hunsel F. Patient organizations’ barriers in pharmacovigilance and strategies to stimulate their participation. Drug Saf. 2021;44(2):181-91.

19. van Hoof M, Chinchilla K, Härmark L, Matos C, Inácio P, van Hunsel F. Factors Contributing to Best Practices for Patient Involvement in Pharmacovigilance in Europe: A Stakeholder Analysis. Drug Saf. 2022;45(10):1083-98.

20. Blenkinsopp A, Wilkie P, Wang M, Routledge PA. Patient reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions: a review of published literature and international experience. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;63(2):148-56.

21. Aishwaryalakshmi K, Sasikala B, Sreelalitha N, Vigneshwaran E, Reddy YP. Assessment of knowledge perception and attitudes on medications in general population. Editor BOARD. 2012;6.

22. Jose J, Jimmy B, Al-Ghailani ASH, Al Majali MA. A cross sectional pilot study on assessing the knowledge, attitude and behavior of community pharmacists to adverse drug reaction related aspects in the Sultanate of Oman. Saudi Pharm J. 2014;22(2):163-9.

23. Cullen G, Kelly E, Murray FE. Patients’ knowledge of adverse reactions to current medications. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2006;62(2): 232-6.

24. Jatau AI, Shitu Z, Khalid GM, Yunusa I, Awaisu A. Understanding adverse drug-related emergency department visits: Development of a conceptual model through a systematic review. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2019;10:1-18.

25. Bongard V, Ménard-Taché S, Bagheri H, Kabiri K, Lapeyre-Mestre M, Montastruc JL. Perception of the risk of adverse drug reactions: differences between health professionals and non health professionals. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002;54(4):433-6.

26. Coleman JJ, Pontefract SK. Adverse drug reactions. Clin Med (Northfield Il). 2016;16(5):481.

27. Montastuc JL, Bongard V, Lapeyre-Mestre M. Perception of the risk of gastrointestinal adverse drug reactions with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (including coxibs): differences among general practitioners, gastroenterologists and rheumatologists. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;59(8-9):685-8.

28. Ferrer RA, Klein WMP. Risk perceptions and health behavior. Curr Opin Psychol. 2015;5:85-9.

29. Matos C, van Hunsel F, Tavares Ribeiro R, do Ó D, Raposo JF. Diabetes patient’s pharmacovigilance knowledge and risk perception: the influence of being part of a patient organisation. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2020;11:2042098620953935.

30. Robinson F, Wilkes S, Schaefer N, Goldstein M, Rice M, Gray J, et al. Patient-centered pharmacovigilance: priority actions from the inherited bleeding disorders community. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2023;14:20420986221146416.

31. Bahri P. Public pharmacovigilance communication: a process calling for evidence-based, objective-driven strategies. Drug Saf. 2010;33:1065-79.

32. Van Hunsel F, Passier A, Van Grootheest K. Comparing patients’ and healthcare professionals’ ADR reports after media attention: the broadcast of a Dutch television programme about the benefits and risks of statins as an example. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;67(5): 558-64.

33. Monteiro L, Monteiro-Soares M, Matos C, Ribeiro-Vaz I, Teixeira A, Martins C. Inappropriate prescriptions in older people – translation and adaptation to Portuguese of the STOPP/START screening tool. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(11):6896.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Authors

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.