Vol. 34 No. 4 (2021), Artykuły
Vol. 34 No. 4 (2021)

Comparison of sensory and rheological properties of green cosmetic creams prepared on different natural, ECOCERT and BDIH certificated self-emulsifying bases

Artykuły
Published 2021-12-30
Katarzyna Wojciechowska
Chair and Department of Applied Pharmacy, Medical University of Lublin, Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9496-2929
Adrianna Walczak
Student Research Group belonging to Chair and Department of Applied Pharmacy, Medical University of Lublin, Poland
Ewelina Rostowska
Gabinet Kosmetyczny Claire Beauty, Lublin, Poland
Ewa Poleszak
Chair and Department of Applied Pharmacy, Medical University of Lublin, Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4359-3953
PDF

Keywords

cream
emulsifier
rheology
sensory analysis
COSMOS

Abstract

The objective of this paper was to evaluate and compare the rheological and sensory properties of six natural cosmetic creams that use ECOCERT certificated emulsifying bases: Beautyderm, Dub Base Expert, Simulgreen™ 18-2, Olivem 1000, Montanov L and Emulgin Succro against two synthetics: Granthix APP and Lanette W. 
The use of emulsifying bases in formulas helps to stabilize the product and improve its rheological and sensory attributes. In this study, the physical and chemical properties of several prepared cosmetic creams were determined. Apparent viscosity and thixotropy were evaluated by viscosimeter, while spreadability was ascertained by extensometer. Moreover, a group of 10 trained members evaluated the sensory properties of the formulas. The obtained formulas based upon natural emulsifiers are characterized by very good physical and chemical properties, high stabilization and good usage quality.
The results were confirmed by sensory analysis. The cosmetic creams made with synthetic emulsifying bases were rated the worst by the study participants, which correlated with the physical tests.

PDF

References

1. Draelos ZD. Cosmeceuticals. Procedures in cosmetic dermatology. Elsevier; 2015.

2. Kim B, Cho H-E, Moon SH, Ahn H-J, Bae S, Cho H-D, et al. Transdermal delivery systems in cosmetics. Biomed Derm. 2020; 4(10).

3. Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the Eurapean Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products. Official Journal of the European Union; 22.12.2009. [https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/endocrine_disruptors/docs/cosmetic_1223_2009_regulation_en.pdf] (access: December 2020).

4. ECOCERT – standard for natural and organic cosmetics, Version 3.1; June 2020. [https://a7e08fa4-7e84-472f-86dd-95a19f777744.filesusr.com/ugd/0bbe4a_7af6a7f98e7f4a21a429ea27863d0da5.pdf] (access: December 2020).

5. COSMOS – standard technical quide, Version 3.1; June 2020. [https://a7e08fa4-7e84-472f-86dd-95a19f777744.filesusr.com/ugd/0bbe4a_ac00d81b94954617a68e9e065f260e93.pdf] (access: December 2020).

6. Hiroshi I, Kunio S. Ingredients and production of cosmetics. Technology of skin and hair care products in Japan. Springer; 2013.

7. Moravkova T, Filip P. The influence of thickeners on the rheological and sensory properties of cosmetic lotions. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica. 2014;11:173-86.

8. Eccleston GM. Function of mixed emulsifiers and emulsifying waxes in dermatological lotions and creams. Colloid Surf A. 1997;1:123-4, 169-82.

9. Gallardo V, Muñoz M, Ruíz M. Formulations of hydrogels and lipogels with vitamin E. J Cosm Derm. 2015;4:187-92 .

10. Jiao J, Burgess DJ. Rheology and stability of water-in-oil-in-water multiple emulsions containing span 83 and tween 80. AAPS Pharm Sci. 2003;5:62-73.

11. Touzan P, DeLambre P. Cosmetic and/or dermatological composition containing salicyclic acid derivative and its use. US patent 6281203 B1 1999.

12. Medina-Torres L, Calderas F, Sanchez-Olivares G, Nuñez-Ramirez DM. Rheology of sodium polyacrylate as an emulsifier employed in cosmetic emulsions. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2014;53: 18346-51.

13. Shahin M, Hady SA, Hammad M, Mortada N. Development of stable o/w emulsions of three different oils. Int J Pharm Stud Res. 2011;2:45-51.

14. Tharwat, FT. Emulsion, formation, stability and rheology. [https://www.wiley-vch.de/books/sample/3527319913_c01.pdf] (access: December 2020).

15. Flemming E, Hehner U, Wilhelm E, Eicken U, Jungo S, Kischka KH, et al. Cosmetic care product with two components. US patent 6117436 A, 2000.

16. Gao LQ, Shu WJ, Gao Y, Zhang JJ. Optimization of amorolfine self-emulsifying base cream by d-optimal mixture design and its rheology. Cent South Pharm. 2010;7.

17. Krynicka I, Żebrowska-Szulc A, Sieradzki E. The influence of emulsifying waxes and moisturizing factors of face creams on the level of skin moisture. Farm Pol. 2011;67:3-8.

18. Martin BJ, Birch RA, Tuck KM. Self-emulsifying encapsulation material. US patent 5711941 A, 1998.

19. Sikora E. Cosmetic emulsions. Crakow: Coracow University of Technology; 2019.

20. Soriano Jiménez MM, Fresno Contreras M, Sellés-Flores E. Development of a cream from a self-emulsifying base and moisturizing actives. Il Farmaco. 2001;56:513-22.

21. Masson DS, Morais GG, Morais JM, Andrade FF, Santos OD, Oliveira WP, et al. Polyhydroxyalcohols and peach oil addition influence on liquid crystal formation and rheological behavior of o/w emulsions. J Disper Sci Technol. 2005;26:463-8.

22. Gaspar LR, Campos M. Rheological behavior and the SPF of sunscreens. Int J Pharm. 2003;250(1):35-44.

23. Gallardo V, Muñoz M. Formulations of hydrogels and lipogels with vitamin E. J Cosm Dermatol. 2015;4:187-92.

24. Goncharova AA, Baranova I. The study of the influence of α-lipoic acid, urea and tea tree oil on the rheological properties of the emulsion cream vehicle for use in diabetic foot syndrome. J Chem Pharm Res. 2014;6:429-35.

25. Maisuthisakul P, Harnsilawat T. Characterization and stabilization of the extract from mango seed kernel in a cosmetic emulsion. Kasetsart J Nat Sci. 2011;45:521-9.

26. Roso A, Clemenceau F, Guilbot J, Kerverd S. Simulgreen™ 18-2: a new green based o/w emulsifying structure for concentrated performances. Cosm Sci Tech. 2012.

27. Martínez MA, Ruíz-Muñoz de Benavides M, Gallardo LV. Influence of the concentration of a gelling agent and the type of surfactant on the rheological characteristics of oleogels. Il Farmaco. 2003;58:1289-94.

28. Osborne R, Carver RS, Mullins LA, Finlay DR. Practical application of cellular bioenergetics to the care of aged skin. Br J Dermatol. 2013;169:32-8.

29. Samczewska G, Ciałkowska-Rysz A. The comparative studies on the bioavailability of morphine hydrochloride and morphine sulphate in model ointments and hydrogels. Pol Med Paliatywna. 2006;5(3):94-107.

30. Garg A, Aggarwal D, S Garg, Singla AK. Spreading of semisolids formulation. An update. Pharm Tech. 2002;9:84-105.

31. Moulai-Mostefa N, Hadji-Sadok A, Sabri N, Hadji A. Determination of optimal cream formulation from long term stability investigation using a surface response modeling. Int J Cosm Sci. 2006;28:211-8.

32. Płocica J, Tal-Figiel B, Figiel W. Rheological and sensory tests used to evaluate cosmetic preparations. Świat Przem Kosm. 2014;1:68-73.

33. Moravkova T, Filip P. The influence of emulsifier on rheological and sensory properties of cosmetic lotions. Adv Mat Sci Eng. Article ID 168503. 2013;7.

34. Medina-Torres L, Calderas F, Sanchez-Olivares G, Nuñez-Ramirez DM. Rheology of sodium polyacrylate as an emulsifier employed in cosmetic emulsions. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2014;53:18346-51.

35. Maru AD, Surawase RK, Bodhe PV. Development and evaluation of moisturizing cream containing rice bran wax. RJTCS. 2012;3(2):40-4.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Authors

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.