Abstract
In this work, we undertook a study of the sonographic parameters of the pancreas and gall bladder in healthy men with different somatotypes. The study-subjects were from the Podillya region of Ukraine. Herein, the majority of gallbladder dimensions (length, thickness, cross-sectional area and volume) in men type-classified as endo-mesomorphic, were significantly higher when compared with men in general and with those of the meso- and ecto-mesomorphic somatotype. Furthermore, the dimensions of the pancreas (width of head and tail length) in mesomorphic males were significantly higher than that of endo-mesomorphic males. The rest of the studied parameters (length, longitudinal cross section area of the gall bladder, the thickness of the head, body and head length, the width of the body and tail of the pancreas) in men of the different somatotypes have no significant differences.References
1. Gulman M.I. et al. The anatomical features of the structure of hepato-pancreatic-duodenal zone. Siberian Medical Journal. 4, 1999.
2. Johnson C.D., Schmit J.D. Mayo Clinic Gastoreintestinal Imaging Review. Rochester (USA): Mayo Clinic Scientific Press. 737, 2013.
3. Guenter Schmidt, Lucas Greiner, Dieter, Nuernberg. Differential Diagnosis in Ultrasound Imaging, 2nd edition edition. Thieme. 580, 2014.
4. Belik N.V. et al. Age, gender and somatotypological features of size and shape of the gall bladder in healthy city teenagers of Podillya. Biomedical and Biosocial Anthropology. 4, 2005.
5. Paul Allan, Grant Baxter, Michael Weston. Clinical Ultrasound, 2-Volume Set. Churchill Livingstone, 1624, 2011.
6. Mirko D'Onofrio. Ultrasonography of the Pancreas: Imaging and Pathologic Correlations. Springer Science & Business Media, 205, 2012.
7. Chaplygina E.V. et al. The dependence of volume of the liver from somatotype and gender of the patient. Scientific Review. 7, 2013.
8. Bakhareva N.S. The morphometric parameters of the pancreas, depending on the somatotype, sex and age men affiliation. International Scientific Research Journal. 1, 2013.
9. Tchacarski Valery et al. Atlas of diagnostic ultrasound. First English Edition, Sofia, 2015.
10. Shaparenko P.P. Anthropometry. Vinnitsa, 71, 2000.
11. Carter J.E.L. The Heath-Carter anthropometric somatotype. Instruction Manual. Surrey, Canada: TeP and Rosscraft, 154, 2002.
12. Nikolic S. et al. Analysis of body mass components in national club football players in republic of Macedonia. Medicine Archives. 68, 3, 2014.
13. Tikhomirova V.D. Children Operative Surgery: A Practical Guide. M.: OOO “Izdatelstvo” Medicinskoe Informacionnoe Agenstvo 872, 2011.
14. Forbes A. et al. Atlas of Clinical Gastroenterology. 3ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier Mosby. 358, 2011.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright (c) 2016 Authors