Review of studies concerning job performance of nursing staff

Authors

  • Marta Szara Chair and Department of Management in Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Medical University of Lublin Author
  • Anna Ksykiewicz-Dorota Chair and Department of Management in Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Medical University of Lublin Author
  • Jadwiga Klukow Chair and Department of Management in Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Medical University of Lublin Author
  • Marzena Lamont Chair and Department of Management in Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Medical University of Lublin Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1515/pielxxiw-2017-0023

Keywords:

job performance, nursing, management in nursing

Abstract

REVIEW OF STUDIES CONCERNING JOB PERFORMANCE OF NURSING STAFF

Introduction. Work performance is defined as a total value of behaviours expected from the employees during evaluation performed within a specified time. According to the basic and dichotomous division, performance refers to behaviours of employees (behavioural), and the results of their work. In addition, the researchers differentiate: task performance, contextual performance and adaptive performance.

Results. Since the 1960s, many international researchers have been engaged in problems concerning the performance of work of nursing staff. Until today, the above-mentioned scope of problems remains up-to-date, but has been poorly recognized in Polish literature [1,2,3]. In the international reports the authors prove that the multi-aspect phenomenon of work performance depends on many variables. Many studies confirmed the relationship between job performance and personal traits of the employee, shift work, level of stress, social support, interpersonal relationships, leadership, as well as organizational culture.

References

1. Łyś D. Analiza wydajności pracy personelu medycznego. OPM. 2011; 7: 60-62.

2. Sierpińska L, Ksykiewicz-Dorota A. Klimat organizacyjny jako warunek wstępny efektywnej pracy zespołu terapeutycznego. Ann. UMCS, Sect. D 2003; 58(2): 136-141.

3. Smoleń E, Ksykiewicz-Dorota A. Struktura czasu pracy pielęgniarek pediatrycznych na oddziałach szpitalnych o różnym poziomie referencyjnym. Med. Pr. 2017; 68(1): 95-103.

4. Dilworth AS. Measure of nursing performance. Nurs Res. 1960; 9(4): 217.

5. Tate BL. Evaluation of clinical performance of the staff nurse. Nurs Res. 1962; 7(1): 7-9.

6. Jahromi Z, Kargar M, Ramezanli S. Study of the Relationship Between Nurse Self-Concept and Clinical Performance Among Nursing Students. Jentashapir J Health Res. 2015; 6(5): 54-58.

7. Baethge A, Müller A, Rigotti T. Nursing performance under high workload: A diary study on the moderating role of selection, optimization and compensation strategies. J AdvNurs. 2016; 76 (3): 545-557.

8. Campbell JP. Modeling the Performance Prediction Problem in Industrial and Organizational Psychology’, in M. D. Dunnette and L. M. Hough (eds), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Vol. 1, Wydawnictwo PaloAlto: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1990, s. 687-732.

9. Motowidlo S, Borman W, Schmidt N. A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human Performance. 1997; 10: 71-83.

10. Sonnetag S, Volmer J, Spychala A. Job performance. w: Barling J, Cooper CL. (red). The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Behavior, Volume One: Micro Approaches, Los Angeles. California: Wydawnictwo SAGE Publications Ltd.; 2008, s.427-447.

11. Hesketh B, Neal A. Technology and Performance. w: Ligen DR., Pulakos ED. (red).The Changing Nature of Performance: Implications for Staffing, Motivation, and Development, San Francisco: Wydawnictwo Jossey-Bass; 2000, s.21-55.

12. Sotter J, Motowidlo S. Interpersonal Facination and job dedication asseparate facets of contextual performance. J Appl Psychol. 1996; 181(5): 525-531.

13. Murphy PR, Jackson SE. Managing Work Role Performance. Challenging the Twenty First Century Organizations and Their Employees, w: Ligen DR., Pulakos ED. (red). The Changing Nature of Performance: Implications for Staffing, Motivations, and Development. San Francisco: Wydawnictwo Jossey-Bass: 1999, s.325-365.

14. London M, Mone EM. Continuous Learning, w: Ligen DR., Pulakos ED. (red). The Changing Nature of Performance: Implications for Staffing, Motivation, and Development. San Francisco: Wydawnictwo Jossey-Bass; 1999, s.119-153.

15. Pulakos ED, Arad S, Donovan M A, et al. Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. J Appl Psychol. 2000; 85: 612-624.

16. While AE. Competence versus performance: which is the most important? J AdvNurs. 1994; 20: 525-531.

17. Robb Y, Fleming V, Dietert Ch. Measurement of clinical performance of nurses: a literature review. Nurs Educ Today. 2002; 22: 293-300.

18. Al-Makhaita HM, Sabra AA, Hafez AS. Job performance among nurses working in two different health care levels, Eastern Saudi Arabia: A comparative study. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2014; 7(3): 832-837.

19. Dahiru T, Aliyu A, Acne TS. Statistics in medical research misuse of sampling and sample size determination. Ann Afr Med. 2006; 5(3): 158-161.

20. Fitzpatrick J, While A, Roberts J. Shift work and its impact upon nurse performance: current knowledge and research issues. J Adv Nurs. 1999; 29(3): 18-27.

21. Buljac-Samardzic M, Dekker-van Doorn C, van Wijngaarden JDH, et al. Interventions to improve team effectiveness: A systematic review. Health Policy. 2010; 94: 183-195.

22. AbuAlRub RF. Job Stress, Job Performance and Social Support Among Hospital Nurses. J Nurs Scholarship. 2004; 36 (1): 73-78.

23. Bartlett H, Simonite V, Westcott E, et al. A comparison of the nursing competence of graduates and diplomats from UK nursing programmes. Clin Nurs. 2000; 9: 369-381.

24. Roud D, Giddings L, Koziol-McLain J. A longitudinal survey of nurses’ self-reported performance during an entry to practice programme. Nurs Prax New Zeal. 2005; 21(4): 37-46.

25. Swanson M. Baccalaureate Nursing Education: Students’ Perceptions of Roles, Effort, and Performance. J Nurs Educ. 1987; 26 (9): 380-383.

26. Takase M, Kershaw E, Burt L. Nurse-enviroment misfit and nursing practice. J Adv Nurs. 2001; 35(6): 819-826.

27. Roche M, Duffield Ch, Friedman S, et al. Regulated and unregulated nurses in the acute hospital settings: Task performed, delayed or not completed. J Clin Nurs. 2015; 25: 153-162.

28. Vaughan F. What is Spiritual Intelligence? J Humanist Psychol. 2002; 42 (2): 16-33.

29. Rani AA, Abidin I, Hamid MR. The Impact of Spiritual Intelligence on Work Performance: Case studies in Government Hospitals of East Cost Malaysia. The Macrotheme Review. 2013; 2(3): 46-59.

30. Beauvais AM, Brady N, O’sha ER, et al. Emotional intelligence and nursing performance among nursing students. Nurs Educ Today. 2011; 31: 396-401.

31. Fujino Y, Tanaka M, Yonemitsu Y, et al. The relationship between characteristic of nursing performance and years experience on nurses with high emotional intelligence. Int J Nurs Pract. 2014; 21: 876-881.

32. Top M. Organizational Variables on Nurses’ Job Performance in Turkey: Nursing Assessments. Iranian J Publ Healh. 2013; 42(3): 267-271.

33. Amarneh BH, Al-Rub RF, Al-Rub NF. Co-workers’ support and job performance among nurses in Jordanian Hospitals. J Res Nurs. 2010; 15(5): 391-401.

34. Fujino Y, Kawamoto R. Effect of Infomation and Communication Technology on Nursing Performance. CIN-Comput Inform Nu. 2013; 32(5): 244-250.

Published

2018-02-01

How to Cite

Szara, M., Ksykiewicz-Dorota, A., Klukow, J., & Lamont, M. (2018). Review of studies concerning job performance of nursing staff. Nursing in the 21st Century, 16(3(60), 51-56. https://doi.org/10.1515/pielxxiw-2017-0023