The impact of carbohydrate intake on the behavior and cognitive functions of children and adolescents

Authors

  • Weronika Wasyluk Graduate, Medical University in Lublin, Poland Author
  • Gabriela Zdunek Medical University of Warsaw, Poland Author
  • Agnieszka Pedrycz Chair and Department of Histology and Embryology with Experimental Cytology Unit, Medical University in Lublin, Poland Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/pjph-2019-0015

Keywords:

sugar, diet, memory, learning, behavior, glycemic index

Abstract

Introduction. Although carbohydrates are the most commonly studied nutrients regarding their influence on cognitive func­tions, there is no unequivocal agreement on whether this influence really exists and what its manifestations are. 

Aim. This study is a literature review of research on the association between sugar intake, behavior and cognitive functions in children population. 

Material and methods. The analysis of the studies on the carbohydrate intake and its impact on behavior and cognitive func­tions of children and adolescents on the basis of MEDLINE database was conducted. The studies were found in PubMed Internet search engine. The following words were implemented in various combinations: “sugar”, “carbohydrate”, “glycemic index”, “GI”, “glucose” as well as “cognition”, “cognitive”, “learning”, “memory”, “attention”, “behavior”, “hyperactivity”. The number of 27 publications was chosen and the information they contained was analyzed. 

Results. Despite multiple studies on the impact of carbohydrate intake and their glycemic index on cognitive functions, there is still no agreement on this issue. Multiple studies indicate the association between glycemic index and cognitive processes. The positive impact of low GI breakfast intake on the concentration and memory is relatively frequently emphasized. The concept that indicates the association between sugar intake and hyperactive behavior among children also has not been unequivocally confirmed in the analyzed studies – contrarily – some of them indicated lack of such relationship. The placebo effect may be the explanation for the above concept. The association between the number of carbohydrates in diet and sleep disorders also has not been proved. 

Conclusions. Although there are no unequivocal scientific foundations to limit the intake of simple sugars and consume poly­saccharides with low GI to improve behavior and cognitive functions, such actions are consistent with a healthy diet and should be recommended for children and adolescents.

References

1. Horvath A, Rachtan-Janicka J. Podstawowe zapotrzebowanie energetyc­zne. In: H. Szajewska. Żywienie i leczenie żywieniowe dzieci i młodzieży. Kraków: Medycyna Praktyczna; 2017. p. 22-31.

2. Jarosz M, Sajór I, Gugała-Mirosz S, et al. In: M. Jarosz. Normy żywienia dla populacji Polski. Warszawa: Instytut Żywności i Żywienia; 2017. p. 98-114.

3. Dye L, Blundell J. Functional foods: psychological and behavioural func­tions. Br J Nutr. 2002;88(Suppl 2):187-211.

4. Schmitt JA, Benton D, Kallus KW. General methodological considerations for the assessment of nutritional influences on human cognitive functions. Eur J Nutr. 2005;44(8):459-64.

5. Westenhoefer J, Bellisle F, Blundell JE, et al. PASSCLAIM –mental state and performance. Eur J Nutr. 2004;43(Suppl 2):II85-II117.

6. Riby LM. The impact of age and task domain on cognitive performance: a meta-analytical review of the glucose facilitation effect. Brain Impair­ment. 2004;5:145-65.

7. Leigh Gibson E, Green MW. Nutritional influences on cognitive function: mechanisms of susceptibility. Nutr Res Rev. 2002;15(1):169-206.

8. Messier C. Glucose improvement of memory: a review. Eur J Pharmacol. 2004;490(1-3):33-57.

9. Gilsenan MB, de Bruin EA, Dye L. The influence of carbohydrate on cog­nitive performance: a critical evaluation from the perspective of glycaemic load. Br J Nutr. 2009;107(1):941-9.

10. Hoyland A, Lawton CL, Dye L. Acute effects of macronutrient manipula­tions on cognitive test performance in healthy young adults: A systematic research review. Neurosci Biobehav R. 2008;32(1):72-85.

11. Chugani HT. A critical period of brain development: studies of cerebral glucose utilization with PET. Prev Med. 1998;27(2):184-8.

12. Ingwersen J, Defeyter MA, Kennedy DO, et al. A low glycaemic index breakfast cereal preferentially prevents children’s cognitive performance from declining throughout the morning. Appetite. 2007;49(1):240-4.

13. Wesnes KA, Pincock C, Richardson D, et al. Breakfast reduces declines in attention and memory over the morning in schoolchildren. Appetite. 2003;41(3):329-31.

14. Benton D, Maconie A, Williams C. The influence of the glycaemic load of breakfast on the behaviour of children in school. Physiol Behav. 2007;92(4):717-24.

15. Micha R, Rogers PJ, Nelson M. Glycaemic index and glycaemic load of breakfast predict cognitive function and mood in school children: a ran­domised controlled trial. Br J Nutr. 2011;106(10):1552-61.

16. Micha R, Rogers PJ, Nelson M. The glycaemic potency of breakfast and cognitive function in school children. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010;64(9):948-57.

17. Donohoe RT, Benton D. Cognitive functioning is susceptible to the level of blood glucose. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1999;145:378-85.

18. Owens DS, Parker PY, Benton D. Blood glucose and subjective energy following cognitive demand. Physiol Behav. 1997;62:471-8.

19. Scholey AB, Harper S, Kennedy DO. Cognitive demand and blood glu­cose. Physiol Behav. 2001;73:585-92.

20. Sunram-Lea SI, Foster JK, Durlach P, Perez C. Glucose facilitation of cog­nitive performance in healthy young adults: examination of the influence of fast-duration, time of day and pre-consumption plasma glucose levels. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2001;157:46-54.

21. Smith MA, Foster JK. The impact of a high versus a low glycaemic index breakfast cereal meal on verbal episodic memory in healthy adolescents. Nutr Neurosci. 2008;11(5):219-27.

22. Abargouei AS, Kalantari N, Omidvar N, et al. Refined carbohydrate intake in relation to non-verbal intelligence among Tehrani schoolchildren. Pub­lic Health Nutr. 2012;15(10):1925-31.

23. Wolraich ML, Wilson DB, White JW. The effect of sugar on behavior or cognition in children. A meta-analysis. 1995;274(20):1617-21.

24. Azadbakht L, Esmaillzadeh A. Dietary patterns and attention deficit hy­peractivity disorder among Iranian children. Nutrition. 2012;28(3):242-9.

25. Park S, Cho SC, Hong YC, et al. Association between dietary behav­iors and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and learning disabilities in school-aged children. Psychiatry Res. 2012;198(3):468-76.

26. Peacock PJ, Lewis G, Northstone K, Wiles NJ. Childhood diet and be­havioural problems: results from the ALSPAC cohort. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2011;65(6):720-6.

27. Kim Y, Chang H. Correlation between attention deficit hyperactivity disor­der and sugar consumption, quality of diet, and dietary behavior in school children. Nutr Res Pract. 2011;5(3):236-45.

28. Del-Ponte B, Anselmi L, Assunção MCF, et al. Sugar consumption and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): A birth cohort study. J Affect Disord. 2019;243:290-6.

29. Watson EJ, Coates AM, Banks S, Kohler M. Total dietary sugar consump­tion does not influence sleep or behaviour in Australian children. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2018;64(3):503-12.

30. Jansen EC, Miller AL, Lumeng JC, et al. Externalizing behavior is pro­spectively associated with intake of added sugar and sodium among low socioeconomic status preschoolers in a sex-specific manner. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;3:135.

31. Hoover DW, Milich R. Effects of sugar ingestion expectancies on mother-child interactions. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1994;22(4):501-15.

Downloads

Published

2019-11-06