Geohelmints’ egg contamination of the parks and sandpits in Lublin area

Authors

  • Michał Bartosik Chair and Department Biology and Genetics, Medical University of Lublin Author
  • Jolanta Rzymowska Chair and Department Biology and Genetics, Medical University of Lublin Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12923/

Abstract

The aim of this study was examination of geohelmints’ contamination of the parks and sandpits in Lublin area. The number of 100 samples of soil from parks, local lanes, other places of entertainment and 60 samples of sand from sandpits near local playgrounds were collected in the three residential area of Lublin (Czechow, Czuby and LSM). Every dry sample (200 g) was studied by Dada method – flotation with saturated ZnSO4 reaction. Most often, geohelmints’ eggs were Toxocara spp. – 7% of examined samples of soils and 20.0% samples of sand and Toxascaris leonina – 11% of soil samples and 11.6% sand samples. In the examined samples single eggs of Trichuris spp eggs and Ancylostomatidae family were also observed.

References

1. Altreuther G., Schimmel A., Schroeder I., Bach T. et al.: Efficacy of emodepside plus praziquantel tablets against mature and immature infections with Toxocara canis and Toxascaris leonina in dogs. Parasitol Rev., 105 S1-8, 2009.

2. Dada B. J. O.: A New technique for a recovery of Toxocara eggs from soil. J. Helmintol., 53, 141, 1979.

3. Duménigo B., Gálvez D.: Soil contamination in Ciudad de La Habana province with Toxocara canis eggs. Rev. Cubana Med. Trop., 47, 178, 1995.

4a. Gundłach J. L., Sadzikowski A. B., Tomczuk K.: Zanieczyszczenie jajami Toxocara spp. wybranych środowisk miejskich i wiejskich. Med. Wet., 52, 395, 1996.

4b. Gundłach J. L., Sadzikowski A. B., Tomczuk K.: Występowanie przeciwciał anty Toxocara canis w surowicach ludzi. Med. Wet., 52, 516, 1996.

5. Hogarth-Scott R. S.: Visceral larva migrans – an immunofluorescent examination of rabbit and human sera for antibodies to the ES antigens of the second stage larvae of Toxocara canis, Toxocara cati and Toxascaris leonina. Immunology, 10, 217, 1966.

6. Holland C. V. and Smith H. V.: Toxocara the enigmatic parasite. CAB International, Cambridge 2006.

7. Leonard D., Echenique C., Lamas MC., Salomon C. J.: High efficacy of albendazole-PEG 6000 in the treatment of Toxocara canis larva migrans infection. Antimicrob. Chemother., 64, 375, 2009.

8. Łużna-Łyskov A.: Toxocarosis In children living In a highly contaminated area. An epidemiological and clinical study. Acta Parasitol., 45, 40, 2000.

9. Matsuo J., Nakashio S.: Prevalence of fecal contamination in sandpits in public parks in Sapporo City, Japan. Vet. Parasitol., 128, 115, 2005.

10. Mizgajska H.: Rola czynników środowiskowych w biologii nicieni rodzaju Toxocara AWF, Poznań 1998

11. Mizgajska-Wiktor H., Jarosz W.: A comparison of soil contamination with Toxocara canis and Toxocara cati eggs in rural and urban areas of Wielkopolska district in 2000-2005. Wiad. Parazytol., 53, 219, 2007.

12. Pawłowski Z. S., Mizgajska H.: Toksokaroza w Wielkopolsce w latach 1990-2000. Przegl. Epidemiol., 56, 559, 2002.

13. Praca zbiorowa: Toksokaroza. Epidemiologia, klinika, diagnostyka, leczenie I zapobieganie. Agencja Reklamowo-Wydawnicza, Warszawa 2005

14. Schöttler G.: Beach sand analyses for the incidence of nematode genuo Toxocara Congrès Jahrestagung der Deutschen STD-Gesellschaft No49, München, ALLEMAGNE, 60, A101-A109 (6 ref.): 766, 1998.

15. Uga S., Minami T., Nagata K.: Defecation habits of cats and dogs and contamination by Toxocara eggs in public parks sandpits. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 54, 122, 1996.

16. Zwoliński J.: The risk factors of Toxocara canis infestation in population of patients from the Lublin region. Wiad. Parazytol., 46, 463, 2000.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-04