The impact of the level of education and paid work on HbA1c concentrationsin patients with type 1 diabetes – preliminary findings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12923/Keywords:
type 1 diabetes, education level, employment, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C)Abstract
Patients’ level of education and performance of paid work can have an impact on the level of type 1 diabetes metabolic control. The aim was to establish, based on own research, the impact of education and paid work on the level of metabolic control in patients with type 1 diabetes as indicated by HbA1c levels. 44 patients (26F; 18M) aged 20–59 (mean 37.4±12.2) years. The duration of diabetes was 0.5−29 (mean 13.7±9.2) years. Only 4 patients (2F; 2M) had primary education, 26 (i.e. 59%; 16F and 10M) had secondary education and 14 (i.e. 32%; 8F and 6M) had higher education. 15 (34%) patients performed paid work, including 9 (64%) subjects with higher and 6 (23%) with secondary education. The data on the level of education and employment were obtained in a survey designed by the authors of this study. In each case the patient’s age and the duration of the disease were considered. The subjects were classified according to their level of education into groups 1 (higher education) and 2 (secondary education) and according to their employment into groups 3 (employed) and 4 (unemployed). The mean HbA1C for the entire group was 7.7±1.9% (M − 7.02±1.9%; F − 8.2±1.8). No significant difference was found between the groups of patients with higher and secondary education with respect to age, the diabetes duration and BMI. Mean HbA1C in groups 1 and 2 were: 7.3±2% and 7.8±1.9% (NS) respectively. The group of employed patients was characterized by a lower mean age, diabetes duration and BMI. Mean HbA1C levels in groups 3 and 4 were: 7.8±2.2% and 7.5±1.8% (NS) respectively. The lowest and highest mean HbA1c levels were found in subgroups of patients with higher education: they were 5.7±1.3% in unemployed persons and 8.2±1.9% in employed persons (p<0.05). Within the group of patients with secondary education the mean HbA1c levels were 7.9±1.6% in unemployed persons and 7.3±2.6% in those employed (NS). In patients with type 1 diabetes higher education was linked with better metabolic control which became considerably worse due to the performance of paid work.
References
1. Biderman A., Noff E., Harris S.B. et al. : Treatment satisfaction of diabetic patients: what are the contributing factors? Fam. Pract., 26, 102, 2009.
2. Brown A.F., Ettner S.L., Piette J. et al.: Socioeconomic position and health among persons with diabetes mellitus: A Conceptual Framework and Review of the Literature. Epidemiol. Rev., 26, 63, 2004.
3. Chaturvedi N.: Commentary: Socioeconomic status and diabetes outcomes; what might we expect and why don’t we find it? Int. J. Epidemiol., 33, 871, 2004.
4. Gnavi R., Petrelli A., Demaria M. et al.: Mortality and educational level among diabetic and non-diabetic population in the Turin Longitudinal Study: a 9-year follow-up. Int. J. Epidemiol., 33, 864, 2004.
5. Kroenke C.H., Spiegelman D., Manson J. et al.: Work Characteristics and Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes in Women. Am. J. Epidemiol., 165, 175, 2007.
6. Kawakami N., Akachi K., Shimizu H. et al.: Job strain, social support in the workplace, and haemoglobin A1c in Japanese men. Occup. Environ. Med., 57, 805, 2000.
7. Milton B., Holland P., Whitehead M.: The social and economic consequences of childhood-onset Type 1 diabetes mellitus across the life course: a systematic review. Diabet. Med., 23, 821, 2006.
8. Polskie Towarzystwo Diabetologiczne: Zalecenia kliniczne dotyczące postępowania u chorych na cukrzycę. Diabetologia Praktyczna, 11, suppl. A, 2010.
9. Schillinger D., Barton L.R, Karter A.J. et al.: Does literacy mediate the relationship between education and health outcomes? A study of a low-income population with diabetes. Public Health Rep., 121, 245, 2006.
10. Swift E.E., Chen R., Hershberger A. et al.: Demographic risk factors, mediators, and moderators in youths' diabetes metabolic control. Ann. Behav. Med., 32, 39, 2006.
11. Tunceli K., Bradley C.J, Nerenz D. et al.: The impact of diabetes on employment and work productivity. Diabetes Care, 28, 2662, 2005.
12. Trief P.M., Aquilino C., Paradies K. et al.: Impact of the work environment on glycemic control and adaptation to diabetes. Diabetes Care, 22, 569, 1999.
13. Von Korff M., Katon W., Lin E.H. et al.: Work disability among individuals with diabetes. Diabetes Care, 28, 1326, 2005.
14. Venkat Narayan K.M., Boyle J.P., Thompson T.J. et al.: Lifetime risk for diabetes mellitus in the United States. JAMA, 290, 1884, 2003.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2010 Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.