Nurses as influencers in the opinion of nursing students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12923/pielxxiw-2025-0007Keywords:
nurse influencer, social media, credibility, nursingAbstract
NURSES AS INFLUENCERS IN THE OPINION OF NURSING STUDENTS
Introduction. The popularity of social media makes it an effective tool for communicating about health. In this context, the role of an influencer becomes important, i.e. an online opinion leader who, through his/her media activity, influences the behavior and decisions of recipients. This study focuses on nurses influencers and the social perception of their activities.
Aim. The aim of the study is to determine the dimensions of perception of nurses influencers, their determinants and consequences based on survey research. Detailed research questions were asked regarding the popularity, credibility, image features, quality and relevance of the messages and the effectiveness of the impact of nurses influencers in the individual and social dimensions.
Material and methods. The study was conducted on a group of 127 nursing students. The research material was collected using own questionnaire, and the results obtained were subjected to statistical analysis.
Results. The study analyzed 127 completed survey questionnaires. All of the surveyed students used social media. When it comes to 70.1% of all respondents, they follow profiles of professional nurses on social media, most commonly on TikTok (61.42%). However, it is the Instagram profiles that generate the highest levels of trust (66.14%). For respondents, the most important topic discussed on social media is medical advice (71.65%). A part of respondents (68) expressed their concerns about the impact of nurses influencers on society.
Conclusions. The results of the conducted survey allowed to draw conclusions about the perception of nurses influencers among nursing students. The collected data made it possible to determine the high level of popularity of nurses influencers and their activities, as well as to specify the important dimensions of influencers’ credibility. The study identified which social media platforms are the most effective in building their credibility. In the light of the data, the features of the desired image of nurses influencers and their potential to shape attitudes are outlined. Respondents’ answers also allowed for the identification of concerns associated with the influencer activity of nurses.
References
1. Godzic W. Znani z tego, że są znani. Celebryci w kulturze tabloidów. Warszawa: Wyd. Akademickie i Profesjonalne; 2007.
2. Rojek C. Celebrity. London: Reaktion Books; 2001.
3. Zawojski P. Cyberkultura jako nowy paradygmat kultury medialnej. Rozważania teoretyczne. [w]: Wilk E, Kolasińska-Pasterczyk I, (red.). Nowa audiowizualność – nowy paradygmat kultury? Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego; 2008, s. 21-30.
4. Cialdini RB. Wywieranie wpływu na ludzi: Teoria i praktyka. Gdańsk: GWP; 2016.
5. Kaczmarek K. Klasyczna teoria charyzmy Maxa Webera. [w:] Drozdowski R, (red.). Końce i początki. Socjologiczne podsumowania, socjologiczne zapowiedzi. Poznań: Wydawnictwo UAM; 2007, s. 15-34.
6. Siuda P. O roli oraz znaczeniu sieciowych celebrytów w społeczności internautów [w:] Muszyński W, (red.). „Małe tęsknoty?”. Style życia w czasie wolnym we współczesnym społeczeństwie. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek; 2009, s. 31-43.
7. Fabijańczyk J, Cupriak A. Influencer marketing – praktycznie. Bielsko Biała: Whitepress; 2016.
8. Mrad M, Ramadan Z, Nasr I. Computer-generated influencers: the rise of digital personalities. Markering Intelligence & Planning. 2022; 5: 589-603.
9. Szpunar M. Społeczna przestrzeń Internetu – Internet jako medium komunikacji społecznej, [w:] B. Aouil, W. Maliszewski (red.). Media-Komunikacja-Zdrowie: Wyzwania-Szanse-Zagrożenia. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek; 2008, s. 31-51.
10. Nowak PF, Chalimoniuk-Nowak M. Potencjał mediów społecznościowych w edukacji zdrowotnej. [w:] A. Wolska-Adamczyk (red.). Współczesne kierunki działań prozdrowotnych. Warszawa: WSIiZ; 2015, s. 35-45.
11. Zadarko E, Zadarko-Domaradzka M. Nowe media jako narzędzie edukacji zdrowotnej i modelowania zachowań współczesnego społeczeństwa. Edukacja – Technika – Informatyka. 2017; 1(19): 266-272.
12. Raport Digital; 2023. Available: https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2023-poland (Accessed on: 25 October 2024).
13. Stefaniak IM. Profesjonalne i eksperckie media społecznościowe a rynek pracy. Studia Ekonomiczne. 2016; 258: 187-198.
14. Badzińska E. Media interaktywne warunkiem skutecznej komunikacji społecznej. Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy. 2013; 35: 24-40.
15. Kaznowski D. Social media – społeczny wymiar Internetu. [w:] Królewski J, Sala P, (red.). E-marketing. Współczesne trendy. Pakiet startowy. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN; 2016, s. 91-95.
16. Guo Z, Simpson E, Bernardi R. Medfluencer: A Network Representation of Medical Influencers’ Identities and Discourse on Social Media. ArXiv; 2024. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.05198 (Accesed on 28 October 2024).
17. Thompson JD. Public health pedagogy and digital misinformation: Health professional influencers and the politics of expertise. Journal of Sociology. 2023; 59(3): 646-663. https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833221128592.
18. Ng IK, Thong C, Tan LF, et al. The rise of medical influencers: The pros and the cons. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. 2024; 54(3): 231-235. https://doi.org/10.1177/14782715241261736.
19. Pöyry E, Reinikainen H, Luoma-Aho V. The Role of Social Media Influencers in Public Health Communication: Case COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Strategic Communication. 2022; 16(3): 469-484.
20. Looi J, Kemp D, Song YWG. Instagram Influencers in Health Communication: Examining the Roles of Influencer Tier and Message Construal in COVID-19-Prevention Public Service Announcements. Journal of Interactive Advertising. 2022; 23(1): 14-32.
21. Suarez-Lledo V, Alvarez-Galvez J. Prevalence of health misinformation on social media: systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. 2021; 23(1): e17187. https://doi.org/10.2196/17187.
22. Jenkins EL, Ilicic J, Barklamb AM, et al. Assessing the credibility and authenticity of social media content for applications in health communication: scoping review. J. Med. Internet Res. 2020; 22(7): e17296. https://doi.org/10.2196/17296.
23. Sabbagh C, Boyland E, Hankey C, et al. Analysing credibility of UK social media influencers’ weight-management blogs: a pilot study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health. 2020; 17: 1-18.
24. Urbaś J. Społeczna odpowiedzialność influencera w czasie pandemii. Studia Socialia Cracoviensia. 2020; 1(22): 89-107.
25. Engebretsen M. The role, impact, and responsibilities of health experts on social media. A focus group study with future healthcare workers. Frontiers in Communication. 2024; 9: 1296296. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1296296.
26. Pulsmedycyny.pl; 2023. Available: https://pulsmedycyny.pl/system-ochrony-zdrowia/system-ochrony-zdrowia/coraz-wiecej-medykow-aktywnych-na-facebooku-i-instagramie-lista-najpopularniejszych-influencerow-medycznych/ (Accessed on: 25 October 2024)
27. EGospodarka; 2023. Najpopularniejsi influencerzy medyczni polskich social mediów, Available: https://www.egospodarka.pl/179877,Najpopularniejsi-influencerzy-medyczni-polskich-social-mediow,1,93,1.html (Accessed on 27 October 2024).
28. Sykut A, Dobrowolska B. Media elektroniczne i ich wpływ na kreowanie wizerunku zawodowego pielęgniarek według opinii pracujących przedstawicieli tej profesji. Piel. Pol. 2016; 3(61): 347-352. http://dx.doi.org/10.20883/pielpol.2016.30.
29. Pawłowski P, Makuch D, Mazurek P, et al. Possible influence of social media on shaping the image of nurses on the Internet. Pielegniarstwo XXI wieku. 2019; 18(2): 75-83. https://doi.org/10.2478/pielxxiw-2019-0010.
30. Gentry H, Prince-Paul M. The nurse influencer: A concept synthesis and analysis. Nursing Forum. 2021; 56: 181-187. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12516.
31. Smith J, Jones L. Influencers in Healthcare: Their Impact on Patient Behavior. Health Marketing Quarterly. 2021; 38(2): 134-150.
32. Kress D, Godack CA, Berwanger TL, et al. The new script of nursing: using social media and advances in communication – to create a contemporary image of nursing. Contemporary Nurse. 2018; 54(4-5): 388-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2018.1537720.
33. Duan Y, Feng X, Xiao H. Public image of nursing in modern society: An evolving concept analysis. Nurs Open. 2024; 11(9): e70033. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70033. PMID: 39279583; PMCID: PMC11403277.
34. Garcia, M. The Risks of Health Influencers: Misinformation in Social Media. Journal of Health Communication. 2021; 26(5): 450-462.
35. Freire NP, Cunha IC, de Castro DA, et al. Credibility and persuasion in the era of misinformation: digital nursing influencers in Brazil. Acta Paul Enferm. 2024; 37: eAPE02886. https://doi.org/10.37689/acta-ape/2024AO00002886.
36. White K, Brown T. Trust in Health Influencers: The Role of Credibility and Expertise. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2020; 22(4): e12345.
37. Lee S, Kim J. The Role of Social Media in Shaping Nursing Students’ Perceptions. Nurse Education Today. 2022; 112: 105-110.
38. Taylor R. The Unrealistic expectations of nursing in the age of social media. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2023; 127: 103-110.
39. Laskowska M. Nowe media w służbie człowieka. Zarys problematyki w kontekście etyki i aksjologii mediów. Teologia Praktyczna. 2012; 13: 123-137.
40. Gogołek W. Komunikacja sieciowa. Uwarunkowania, kategorie, paradoksy. Warszawa: Wydawnicza Aspra; 2010.
41. Etheredge HR, Early J, Norval D, et al. Influencer marketing by healthcare providers-Ethics and the law. Aesthetic Medicine. 2021; 7(4): 45-51.
42. Darmawan I, Huh J. The effects of message type and sponsorship disclosure in influencer marketing of prescription drugs. Journal of Global Marketing. 2021; 35(1): 21-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2021.1913273.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
