Quality of the educational environment in Slovakia and the Czech Republic using the DREEM inventory

Authors

  • Ľubomíra Lizáková Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of West Bohemia, Czech Republic Author
  • Daša Stupková Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Studies, University of Jan Evangelista in Ustí nad Labem, Czech Republic Author
  • Lucie Libešová Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Studies, University of Jan Evangelista in Ustí nad Labem, Czech Republic Author
  • Ivana Lamková Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Studies, University of Jan Evangelista in Ustí nad Labem, Czech Republic Author
  • Valéria Horanská Pedagogical Department, Secondary Medical School St. Elizabeth in Kosice, Slovak Republic Author
  • Ľudmila Andráščíková Department of Dental Hygiene, Faculty of Health Care, University of Presov in Presov, Slovak Republic Author
  • Alena Lochmannová Department of Emergency Medicine, Diagnostic Sciences and Public Health, Faculty of Health Care Studies, University of West Bohemia, Czech Republic Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7822-0204

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12923/pielxxiw-2025-0006

Keywords:

education, students, nursing, learning environment

Abstract

QUALITY OF THE EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT IN SLOVAKIA AND THE CZECH REPUBLIC USING THE DREEM INVENTORY

Aim. The study aimed to assess and compare nursing students’ perceptions of their educational environment at universities in Slovakia and the Czech Republic, exploring differences based on gender and location, and identifying areas for improvement.

Material and methods. A quantitative study with 742 nursing students was conducted using the DREEM inventory. Data were collected in 2021 and analyzed with SPSS, using descriptive statistics and the Mann-Whitney U test to assess group differences.

Results. Nursing students had a generally positive perception of their educational environment, with no significant differences based on gender or location. While DREEM scores indicated supportive practices, lower scores in the educational atmosphere highlighted potential areas for improvement.

Conclusions. Regular assessment using tools like DREEM is vital to maintain high-quality nursing education. Although the results were positive, the need for improvements in emotional and social support for students remains clear.

References

1. Bakhshialiabad H, Bakhshi G, Hashemi Z, et al. Improving students’ learning environment by DREEM: an educational experiment in an Iranian medical sciences university (2011-2016). BMC Medical Education. 2019; 19(1): 397.

2. Cornelius-White J. Learner-Centered Teacher-Student relationships are effective: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research. 2007; 77(1): 113-143.

3. Branch WT, Paranjape A. Feedback and reflection: teaching methods for clinical settings. Acad. Med. 2002; 77(12 Pt 1): 1185-1188.

4. Sayfulloevna SS. Safe learning environment and personal development of students. International Journal of Formal Education. 2023; 2(3): 7-12.

5. Valerio K. Intrinsic motivation in the classroom. Journal of Student Engagement: Education Matters. 2012; 2(1): 30-35.

6. Pimparyon SMC S, Pemba S, Roff P. Educational environment, student approaches to learning and academic achievement in a Thai nursing school. Medical Teacher. 2000; 22(4): 359-364.

7. Dyrbye LN, Thomas MR, Shanafelt TD. Medical student distress: causes, consequences, and proposed solutions. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2005; 80(12): 1613-1622.

8. Shrestha E, Mehta RS, Mandal G, et al. Perception of the learning environment among the students in a nursing college in Eastern Nepal. BMC Medical Education. 2019; 19(1): 382.

9. van den Berg B a. M, Bakker AB, Ten Cate TJ. Key factors in work engagement and job motivation of teaching faculty at a university medical centre. Perspect Med Educ. 2013; 2(5-6): 264-275.

10. McAleer SR Sean. What is educational climate? Medical Teacher. 2001; 23(4): 333-334.

11. Vaughan B, Carter A, Macfarlane C, et al. The DREEM, part 1: measurement of the educational environment in an osteopathy teaching program. BMC Medical Education. 2014; 14(1): 99.

12. Rothman AI. Learning environment of a medical school: expectations versus perceptions of a first-year class. Medical Education. 1970; 4(4): 289-292.

13. Marshall RE. Measuring the medical school learning environment. Academic Medicine. 1978; 53(2): 98.

14. Tackett S, Bakar HA, Shilkofski NA, et al. Profiling medical school learning environments in Malaysia: a validation study of the Johns Hopkins Learning Environment Scale. J. Educ. Eval. Health Prof. 2015; 12: 39.

15. Roff S, McAleer S, Harden RM, et al. Development and validation of the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM). Medical Teacher. 1997; 19(4): 295-299.

16. Pai PG. Medical Students’ Perception of Their Educational Environment. JCDR [Internet]. 2014 [citován 31. srpen 2024]; Available from: http://www.jcdr.net/article_fulltext.asp?issn=0973-709x&year=2014&volume=8&issue=1&page=103&issn=0973-709x&id=3944

17. Roff S. The Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM) - a generic instrument for measuring students’ perceptions of undergraduate health professions curricula. Medical Teacher. 2005; 27(4): 322-325.

18. Arzuman H, Al-Mahmood AK, Islam S, et al. Students perception of learning environment: A Base Line Study for identifying areas of concern at a Private Medical College, Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science. 2016; 15(2): 234-242.

19. Roff S, McAleer S, Ifere OS, et al. A global diagnostic tool for measuring educational environment: comparing Nigeria and Nepal. Medical Teacher. 2001; 23(4): 378-382.

20. Damiano RF, Furtado AO, da Silva BN, et al. Measuring Students’ Perceptions of the Medical School Learning Environment: translation, transcultural adaptation, and validation of 2 instruments to the Brazilian Portuguese Language. J. Med. Educ. Curric. Dev. 2020; 7: 2382120520902186.

21. Hammond SM, O’Rourke M, Kelly M, et al. A psychometric appraisal of the DREEM. BMC Medical Education. 2012; 12(1): 2.

22. Salminen L, Stolt M, Saarikoski M, et al. Future challenges for nursing education--a European perspective. Nurse. Educ. Today. 2010; 30(3): 233-238.

23. Lahtinen P, Leino-Kilpi H, Salminen L. Nursing education in the European higher education area - variations in implementation. Nurse. Educ. Today. 2014; 34(6): 1040-1047.

24. Cranage K, Foster K. Mental health nurses’ experience of challenging workplace situations: A qualitative descriptive study. Int. J. Ment. Health Nurs. 2022; 31(3): 665-676.

25. Al-Kabbaa AF, Ahmad HH, Saeed AA, et al. Perception of the learning environment by students in a new medical school in Saudi Arabia: Areas of concern. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences. 2012; 7(2): 69-75.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-03