Postrzeganie sztucznej inteligencji przez studentów pielęgniarstwa: badanie eksploracyjne porównujące studentów studiów stacjonarnych i niestacjonarnych
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12923/pielxxiw-2026-0034Słowa kluczowe:
edukacja, postrzeganie, studenci pielęgniarstwa, sztuczna inteligencja, SHAIPAbstrakt
Cel pracy. Celem badania było zbadanie postrzegania sztucznej inteligencji (AI) przez słoweńskich studentów pielęgniarstwa oraz porównanie różnic między studentami studiów stacjonarnych i niestacjonarnych.
Materiał i metody. W okresie od 4 października do 12 grudnia 2024 r. przeprowadzono przekrojową ankietę internetową wśród 95 studentów pierwszego roku pielęgniarstwa na Uniwersytecie Primorska w Słowenii. Postrzeganie sztucznej inteligencji mierzono za pomocą udoskonalonej i zweryfikowanej słoweńskiej wersji kwestionariusza Shinners Artificial Intelligence Perception (SHAIP).
Wyniki. Ogólna średnia punktacja w skali SHAIP wskazywała na neutralny stosunek do sztucznej inteligencji (M = 3,23 na 5, SD = 0,69). Nie stwierdzono istotnych różnic w ogólnej średniej punktacji między studentami studiów stacjonarnych a niestacjonarnych (p = 0,095) ani między płciami (p = 0,258). Jednak studenci studiów stacjonarnych uzyskali istotnie wyższy wynik w zakresie czynnika „Postrzeganie wpływu na środowisko zawodowe” (p = 0,031).
Wnioski. Studenci pielęgniarstwa w Słowenii mają ogólnie neutralny stosunek do sztucznej inteligencji. Różnice między studentami studiów stacjonarnych a niestacjonarnych wskazują, że ci drudzy mogą być mniej świadomi wpływu sztucznej inteligencji na ich zawód, co podkreśla potrzebę przeprowadzenia ukierunkowanych szkoleń. Udoskonalona słoweńska wersja narzędzia SHAIP wykazała odpowiednią trafność i rzetelność.
Bibliografia
1. Alowais SA, Alghamdi SS, Alsuhebany N, et al. Revolutionizing healthcare: the role of artificial intelligence in clinical practice. BMC Med. Educ. 2023;23:689. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04698-z
2. Maleki Varnosfaderani S, Forouzanfar M. The role of AI in hospitals and clinics: transforming healthcare in the 21st Century. Bioengineering 2024;11:337. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11040337
3. Chen J, Liu Y, Liu P, et al. Adoption of large language model AI tools in everyday tasks: multisite cross-sectional qualitative study of chinese hospital administrators. J. Med. Internet. Res. 2025;27:e70789. https://doi.org/10.2196/70789
4. Esmaeilzadeh P. Challenges and strategies for wide-scale artificial intelligence (AI) deployment in healthcare practices: A perspective for healthcare organizations. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. 2024;151:102861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2024.102861
5. Wah JNK. Revolutionizing e-health: the transformative role of AI-powered hybrid chatbots in healthcare solutions. Front. Public Health. 2025;13:1530799. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1530799
6. Serin O, Yıldırım BF, Duman F, et al. Physician perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in healthcare: a cross-sectional study of child-focused care in a Turkish tertiary hospital. IJMI. 2025;203:106003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.106003
7. Khan Rony MK, Akter K, Nesa L, et al. Healthcare workers’ knowledge and attitudes regarding artificial intelligence adoption in healthcare: A cross-sectional study. Heliyon. 2024;10:e40775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40775
8. Hamad NI, El-Ashry AM, Ibrahim IM, et al. Embracing the future: an insight into nursing students’ attitude and perception towards the usability of artificial intelligence in healthcare. Teaching and Learning in Nursing. 2025;20:e500-e508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2024.12.017
9. Farghaly Abdelaliem S, Dator W, Sankarapandian C. The Relationship between nursing students’ smart devices addiction and their perception of artificial intelligence. Healthcare. 2022;11:110. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11010110
10. Namdar Areshtanab H, Rahmani F, Vahidi M, et al. Nurses perceptions and use of artificial intelligence in healthcare. Sci. Rep. 2025;15:27801. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-11002-0
11. Abdolahi Shahvali E, Arizavi Z, Hematipour a, et al. Investigating the level of knowledge, attitude and performance students regarding the applications of artificial intelligence in nursing. Jundishapur Scientific Medical Journal. 2024;23:134-142. https://doi.org/10.32592/JSMJ.23.2.134
12. Abou Hashish EA, Alnajjar H. Digital proficiency: assessing knowledge, attitudes, and skills in digital transformation, health literacy, and artificial intelligence among university nursing students.BMC Med. Educ. 2024;24:508. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05482-3
13. Sheela J. Attitude of nursing students towards artificial intelligence. Int. J. Sci. Healthcare Res. 2022;7:334-347. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijshr.20220447
14. Cho KA, Seo YH. Dual mediating effects of anxiety to use and acceptance attitude of artificial intelligence technology on the relationship between nursing students’ perception of and intention to use them: a descriptive study. BMC Nurs. 2024;23:212. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-01887-z
15. Kwak Y, Ahn J-W, Seo YH. Influence of AI ethics awareness, attitude, anxiety, and self-efficacy on nursing students’ behavioral intentions. BMC Nursing. 2022;21:267. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01048-0
16. Kwak Y, Seo YH, Ahn J-W. Nursing students’ intent to use AI-based healthcare technology: Path analysis using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Nurse Education Today. 2022;119:105541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105541
17. Labrague LJ, Aguilar-Rosales R, Yboa BC, et al. Student nurses’ attitudes, perceived utilization, and intention to adopt artificial intelligence (AI) technology in nursing practice: A cross-sectional study. Nurse Education in Practice. 2023;73:103815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103815
18. Lukić A, Kudelić N, Antičević V, et al. First-year nursing students’ attitudes towards artificial intelligence: Cross-sectional multi-center study. Nurse Education in Practice 2023;71:103735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103735
19. Shinners L, Grace S, Smith S, et al. Exploring healthcare professionals’ perceptions of artificial intelligence: Piloting the Shinners Artificial Intelligence Perception tool. Digital Health. 2022;8:205520762210781. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076221078110
20. Pinto dos Santos D, Giese D, Brodehl S, et al. Medical students’ attitude towards artificial intelligence: a multicentre survey. Eur. Radiol. 2019;29:1640-1646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5601-1
21. Schepman A, Rodway P. Initial validation of the general attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale. Comput. Hum. Behav. Rep. 2020;1:100014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100014
22. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science. 1989;35:982-1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
23. Schorr A. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and its Importance for Digitalization Research: A Review. [In:] Gerber N, Zimmermann V, ed. International Symposium on Technikpsychologie (TecPsy). Sciendo. 2023, p. 55-65. https://doi.org/10.2478/9788366675896-005
24. Darolia R. Working (and studying) day and night: Heterogeneous effects of working on the academic performance of full-time and part-time students. Economics of Education Review. 2014;38:38-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.10.004
25. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, et al. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods. 2007;39:175-191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
26. Praprotnik D. Translation and validation of the SHAIP questionnaire for assessment of nursing staff’s perceptions of artificial intelligence (in Slovene: “Prevod in validacija vprašalnika SHAIP za ocenjevanje stališč zaposlenih v zdravstveni negi o umetni inteligenci”). MSc thesis. University of Primorska, Faculty of Health Sciences, 2024.
27. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, et al. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1. MIS Quarterly. 2003;27:425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
28. Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS: and sex and drugs and rock’n’roll. 3. ed., repr. Los Angeles: Sage; 2012.
29. Alnomasy N, Pangket P, Alreshidi B, et al. Artificial intelligence in health care: Assessing impact on professional roles and preparedness among hospital nurse leaders. Digital Health. 2025;11:20552076251356362. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251356362
30. Sharif L, Almabadi R, Alahmari A, et al. Perceptions of mental health professionals towards artificial intelligence in mental healthcare: a cross-sectional study. Front. Psychiatry. 2025;16:1601456. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1601456
31. Pallant J. SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. Seventh edition. Place of Publication Not Identified: Routledge; 2020.
32. MacCann C, Fogarty GJ, Roberts RD. Strategies for success in education: Time management is more important for part-time than full-time community college students. Learning and Individual Differences. 2012;22:618-623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.09.015
33. Al Omari O, Alshammari M, Al Jabri W, et al. Demographic factors, knowledge, attitude and perception and their association with nursing students’ intention to use artificial intelligence (AI): a multicentre survey across 10 Arab countries. BMC Med. Educ. 2024;24:1456. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06452-5
34. Shinners L, Aggar C, Stephens A, et al. Healthcare professionals’ experiences and perceptions of artificial intelligence in regional and rural health districts in Australia. Australian J. Rural. Health. 2023;31:1203-1213. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.13045
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2026 Denis Černeka, Boštjan Žvanut (Autor)
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
