Towards the humanization of childbirth. The draft standard of maternal care in Poland

Authors

  • Luiza Nowakowska Samodzielna Pracownia Socjologii Medycyny, Katedra Nauk Humanistycznych Wydziału Pielęgniarstwa i Nauk o Zdrowiu, Uniwersytet Medyczny w Lublinie Author

Keywords:

perinatal care, medicalization, humanization of childbirth

Abstract

The pretext for these considerations has become the standard of maternal care in Poland, submitted to public consultation on 21 January 2010 by the Ministry of Health. The text drew attention to the proposal of regulation to the minimization of medical intervention during childbirth, the rights of the patient and increase patient satisfaction with the care provided. Standard, through changes in this area, aims to reduce excessive medicalization of perinatal period. In the text medicalization was treated as a specific model of pregnancy and childbirth, which predominates in many Western countries, and is the subject of increasing criticism. This model denies childbirth as a holistic act – a social, psychological, cultural and physiological interpretation for the medical – as a condition threatening the woman and child, and requiring medical supervision in hospital. One of the manifestation of this sense of medicalization are technological-interventionist philosophy of birth, patologization of pregnancy and objectification of women. 
This model of pregnancy and childbirth is discussed in a broader context as a part of more general phenomenon on the borderland of medicine and social life, which in the social sciences is examined for several decades. Terms of medicalization as a process of appropriation of social space through treatment of complex phenomena in terms of biomedicine, mostly as a disease risk factor or disorder. Also focuses on the arguments cited by proponents of socialized, holistic model of care and support of women, complementary to the hospital system, essential for pregnancies at risk. One of the serious consequences of madicalization, that is, the lowering of tha status od midwives and reducing their autonomy in perinatal care have also been discussed. 

References

1. Projekt Rozporządzenia Ministra Zdrowia w sprawie standardu opieki okołoporodowej.

2. Fundacja Rodzić po Ludzku. Standard krok po kroku. http://www. rodzicpoludzku.pl; 2010.

3. Conrad P. The Medicalization of Society: On The Transformation of Human Conditions Into Treatable Disorders. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2007.

4. Conrad P. Medicalization and Social Control. Annual Review of Sociology 1992;18:209-32.

5. Barański J. Interakcja lekarz-pacjent. W: Barański J, Piątkowski W, (red.) Zdrowie i choroba. Wybrane zagadnienia socjologii medycyny. Wrocław: Oficyna Wydawnicza ATUT Wrocławskie Wyd. Oświatowe; 2002:158-61.

6. Conrad P, Schneider JW. Deviance And Medicalization: From Badness to Sickness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 1992.

7. Domańska U. Medykalizacja i demedykalizacja macierzyństwa. W: Piątkowski W, Brodniak WA (red.) Zdrowie i choroba. Perspektywa socjologiczna. Tyczyn: WSSG; 2005:311-22.

8. Kościelak LJ. Od Webera do Ritzera. Racjonalizacja zaspakajania potrzeb zdrowotnych. W: Piątkowski W, Titkow A (red.) W stronę socjologii zdrowia. Lublin: Wyd. UMCS; 2002.155-65.

9. Purdy L. Medicalization, Medical Necessity, and Feminist Medicine. Bioethics 2001;15:248-61.

10. Podgórska J. Betonowe położnictwo. Polityka 2005;43:4-11.

11. Heimrath T. Przełomy w rozwoju nowożytnego położnictwa warunko- wane nowymi metodami postępowania. W: Płonka-Syroka B, red. Studia z dziejów kultury medycznej. Społeczno-ideowe aspekty medycyny i nauk przyrodniczych XVIII-XX wieku. Wrocław: Oficyna Wydawnicza Arboretum; 2002.

12. Poręba R, Sioma-Markowska U, Poręba A. Poród w ujęciu interdyscyplinarnym. Perinatologia, Neonatologia i Ginekologia 2008; 1,149-51.

13. Wagner M. Ryby nie widzą wody: potrzeba humanizacji porodu. 2001. http://rodzicpoludzku.pl.

14. Jakubowska H. Socjologia ciała. Poznań: Wyd. Naukowe UAM; 2009.

15. Piątkowski W. W stronę socjologii zdrowia. W: Piątkowski W, Titkow A (red.) W stronę socjologii zdrowia. Lublin: Wyd. UMCS;2002:15-33.

16. Gallagher EB. Ideologia konsumpcji a opieka zdrowotna. W: Sokołowska M, Hołówka J, Ostrowska A (red.) Socjologia a zdrowie. Warszawa: Wyd. PWN;1976:191-211.

17. WHO. Make every mother and child count. WHO; 2005.

18. Wertz DC. What Birth Has Done for Doctors: A Historical View. W: Wilson PK, red. The Medicalization Of Obstetrics: Personnel, Practice, and Instruments. New York: Garland Publishing;1996:7-24.

19. Wagner M. Born in the USA. How a Broken Maternity System Must Be Fixed to Put Women and Children First. California: University of California Press; 2006.

20. Brown S, Grimes D. A meta-analysis of nurse practitioners and nurse midwives in primary care. Nurs Res 1995;44:332-9.

21. Wagner M. Midwifery in the Industrialized World. J. Society Obst. Gyn Canada 1998; 20,13:1225-34.

22. MacDorman M, Singh G. Midwifery care, social and medical risk factors, and birth outcomes in the USA. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998; 52:310-17.

23. Rasch V. Maternal Death and the Millennium Development Goals. Dan Med Bull 2007;54:167-9.

Downloads

Published

2010-12-01