Women’s attitude in Poland and Belarus toward the issue of induced abortion

Authors

  • Anna Jaszkiewicz Faculty of Health Science, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland Author
  • Jerzy Zalewski Faculty of Health Science, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland Author
  • Justyna Surdyka Faculty of Health Science, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland Author
  • Jerzy Heimrath Faculty of Health Science, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12923/j.0044-2011/123-4/a.04

Keywords:

abortion, induced, legal, miscarriage, pregnancy

Abstract

Introduction. In most countries, abortion is allowed to save woman’s physical and mental health. In Poland, women have no right to abortion on demand; the procedure is illegal and punishable by imprisonment up to 3 years. In the neighbouring country of Belarus, induced abortion on demand is legal through the 12th week of pregnancy, while for social reasons and on demand, through the 22nd week of pregnancy, in governmental hospitals only. Abortion deserves the name of one of the most serious contemporary ethical dilemmas and constitutes one of the most difficult problems in medical ethics. Performing abortion continues to be opposed by many individuals and communities.

Aim. The study of the attitude of women in Poland toward the problem of induced abortion and the comparison of their attitude with that of women in Belarus.

Material and methods. The method used to conduct this study was a diagnostic survey using a questionnaire designed for the purpose of this work. The study was conducted among women in Poland and Belarus. The group surveyed was comprised primarily of young women of reproductive age, with the desire to conceive, have families or plan to have families. Two hundred surveys, properly filled out, 100 from Poland and 100 from Belarus, qualified for the analysis.

Results. The comparative analysis of the responses of the women surveyed in Poland and Belarus demonstrated that in both countries attitudes toward the problem of induced abortion and women’s opinions on the use of induced abortion are still divided.

Conclusions. Women of Belarus are more supportive of abortion and they consider it less shocking and more common than women from Poland.

References

1. Reber AS. Dictionary of Psychology. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar; 2000.

2. Dictionary of the Polish Language. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN; 1998. p. 7.

3. Pisarski T. Obstetrics and gynecology. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL; 1998. p.334-5.

4. Chazan B, Simon W. Abortion. Causes, consequences, therapy. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Wektory; 2009. p.7-20, 36, 38-41, 65-6, 75, 77-83.

5. Pshyrembel W, Dudenhausen J. Practical obstetrics and obstetrical procedures. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL; 2007.p. 283-5.

6. Tokarczuk R. The right to be born, the right to life and to die. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Prawnicze Lexis Nexis; 1988. p.49-50, 192-7, 202-4.

7. Safe pregnancy termination. Technical guidelines and health policy directions for health care systems. Warsaw: Federation for women and family planning; 2004.

8. Żordania F. Obstetrics handbook. Moskwa: Publisher Medgiz; 2000. p.289-95.

9. Congleton, G. K., Calhoun, L. G. Post-abortion perceptions: A comparison of self-identified distressed and non-distressed populations. Int J Soc Psych.1993;39:255-65.

10. Family and Guardianship Code – 7 January 1993. Law Concerning Family Planning, Human Foetus Protection and Conditions for Legality of Abortion. Journal of Laws: No. 17; Item 78, as amended.

11. Willke J, Willke B. Abortion, questions and answers. Gdańsk: Publisher Stella-Maris; 1991. p.10-29.

12. Family and Guardianship Code – 25 February 1964. Act, Kinship, Chapter II Adoption. Journal of Laws: No. 9; Item 59, as amended.

13. Family and Guardianship Code – 7 January 1983. Law Concerning Family Planning, Human Foetus Protection and Conditions for Legality of Abortion. Journal of Laws: No. 17; Item 78z, as amended.

14. Beck W. Obstetrics and gynaecology. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Medyczne; 1995. p. 469-71, 484-6.

15. Criminal Code. Warsaw: Publisher LexisNexis; 2008. Journal of Laws: No. 88; Item 553, as amended.

16. Health Care Law of the Republic of Belarus of 20.06.2008: No. 363-3; Chapter 4, Article 27 “Artificial pregnancy termination.”

17. Criminal Code of the Republic of Belarus 10.2009: Chapter 12; Article 156 “Illegal abortion.”

18. Przyłuska-Fiszer A. Ethical aspects of the abortion controversy. Warszawa: Publisher AWF; 1997.p.7, 22-33, 132.

19. Pietrzykowski T. Abortion controversy. Katowice: Publisher Sonia Draga; 2007. p.13-50.

Downloads

Published

2013-12-01