Artificial intelligence-assisted acoustic voice analysis as a public health tool for screening and triage of laryngeal diseases: a systematic review with qualitative synthesis

Authors

  • Emilia Wiśniewska Student Scientific Association of MedTech at the Center for Remote Learning and Educational Effects Analysis, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Silesian Medical University, Katowice, Poland Author https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8796-4682
  • Michał Azierski Student Scientific Association of MedTech at the Center for Remote Learning and Educational Effects Analysis, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Silesian Medical University, Katowice, Poland Author https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7247-2086

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12923/2083-4829/2026-0015

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Voice, Voice Disorders, Laryngeal Diseases, Telemedicine, Mass Screening

Abstract

Introduction and aim. Voice disorders and laryngeal diseases impair communication, quality of life and work ability. Persistent dysphonia may also indicate glottic or laryngeal cancer. This systematic review evaluates artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted acoustic voice analysis as a non-invasive tool for screening support, triage and risk stratification of laryngeal diseases and voice disorders.

Methods. The review was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore and Google Scholar were searched using predefined Boolean strategies. The search identified 412 records; after removal of 118 duplicates, 294 titles and abstracts were screened. Eighty-two full texts were assessed, and 30 publications were included in qualitative synthesis. Meta-analysis was not performed because of heterogeneity in target conditions, voice tasks, acoustic features, artificial intelligence (AI) models and outcome metrics.

Brief summary of current knowledge. AI-assisted acoustic voice analysis shows high performance in binary classification of healthy and pathological voice, especially using mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs), perturbation measures, harmonicto-noise ratio (HNR) and spectrogram-based features. However, multiclass classification and differentiation between benign and malignant laryngeal disease remain challenging. Multimodal models using voice, demographic and clinical data appear more promising than voice-only approaches.

Summary. AI-assisted acoustic voice analysis may support scalable screening, triage and telemonitoring, particularly where specialist laryngological care is limited. Implementation requires standardized recordings, external validation, explainable models, safety-netting and prospective clinical studies.

References

1. Liu GS, Jovanovic N, Sung CK, et al. A scoping review of artificial intelligence detection of voice pathology: challenges and opportunities. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024;171:658-666. https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.809

2. Hu H, Chang S, Wang CH, et al. Deep learning application for vocal fold disease prediction through voice recognition: preliminary development study. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23:e25247. https://doi.org/10.2196/25247

3. Wang TV, Song PC. Neurological voice disorders: a review. Int J Head Neck Surg. 2022;13:32-40. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10001-1521

4. Marchese MR, Sensoli F, Campagnini S, et al. Artificial intelligence for the recognition of benign lesions of vocal folds from audio recordings. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2023;43:317-323. https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100x-n2309

5. Torborg S, Kim AY, Rameau A. New developments in the application of artificial intelligence to laryngology. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024;32:391-397. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000000999

6. Bensoussan Y, Vanstrum EB, Johns MM, et al. Artificial intelligence and laryngeal cancer: from screening to prognosis: a state of the art review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;168:319-329. https://doi.org/10.1177/01945998221110839

7. Muddaloor P, Baraskar B, Shah H, et al. The human voice as a digital health solution leveraging artificial intelligence. Sensors (Basel). 2025;25:3424. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25113424

8. Rogers HP, Hseu A, Kim JW, et al. Voice as a biomarker of pediatric health: a scoping review. Children (Basel). 2024;11:684. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11060684

9. Jenkins PM, Harrison R, Bedrick S, et al. Voice as a biomarker: exploratory analysis for benign and malignant vocal fold lesions. Front Digit Health. 2025;7:1609811. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1609811

10. Wilson BS, Tucci DL, Moses DA, et al. Harnessing the power of artificial intelligence in otolaryngology and the communication sciences. JARO. 2022;23:319-349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-022-00846-2

11. Islam R, Tarique M, Abdel-Raheem E. A survey on signal processing based pathological voice detection techniques. IEEE Access. 2020;8:66749-66776. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2985280

12. Tracey B, Volfson D, Glass J, et al. Towards interpretable speech biomarkers: exploring MFCCs. Sci Rep. 2023;13:22787. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-49352-2

13. Reddy MK, Alku P. A comparison of cepstral features in the detection of pathological voices by varying the input and filterbank of the cepstrum computation. IEEE Access. 2021;9:135953-135963. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3117665

14. Song J, Kim H, Lee YO. Laryngeal disease classification using voice data: octave-band vs. mel-frequency filters. Heliyon. 2024;10:e40748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40748

15. Barlow J, Sragi Z, Rivera-Rivera G, et al. The use of deep learning software in the detection of voice disorders: a systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024;170:1531-1543. https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.636

16. Verma V, Benjwal A, Chhabra A, et al. A novel hybrid model integrating MFCC and acoustic parameters for voice disorder detection. Sci Rep. 2023;13:22719. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-49869-6

17. Compton EC, Cruz T, Andreassen M, et al. Developing an artificial intelligence tool to predict vocal cord pathology in primary care settings. Laryngoscope. 2023;133:1952-1960. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.30432

18. Suleman A, Rutt AL. Global utilization of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and management of voice disorders over the past five years. Eye ENT Res. 2025;2:88-95. https://doi.org/10.1002/eer3.70006

19. Oliver JR, Alapati R, Lee JT, et al. Artificial intelligence in head and neck surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2024;57:803-820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2024.05.001

20. Alabdalhussein A, Al-Khafaji M, Al-Busairi R, et al. Artificial intelligence in laryngeal cancer detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Oncol. 2025;32:338. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32060338

21. Wang C, Chen T, Lee N, et al. AI detection of glottic neoplasm using voice signals, demographics, and structured medical records. Laryngoscope. 2024;134:4585-4592. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31563

22. Ma K, Wang Y, Zhou Y, et al. Acoustic signatures of organic lesions and the role of artificial intelligence in voice disorder diagnostics. Digit Health. 2025;11:20552076251376264. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251376264

23. Bose D, Mukherjee A, Acharya M, et al. Artificial intelligence for detection of Parkinson's disease from speech signals—a comprehensive review. Biofactors. 2025;51:e70065. https://doi.org/10.1002/biof.70065

24. Liu Y, Reddy MK, Penttila N, et al. Automatic assessment of Parkinson's disease using speech representations of phonation and articulation. IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process. 2023;31:242-255. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASLP.2022.3212829

25. Maskeliunas R, Kulikajevas A, Damasevicius R, et al. Lightweight deep learning model for assessment of substitution voicing and speech after laryngeal carcinoma surgery. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14:2366. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14102366

26. Syamal MN. The effects of COVID-19 on voice. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025;11:524-529. https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.70012

27. Gomez-Vilda P, Gomez-Rodellar A, Palacios-Alonso D, et al. The role of data analytics in the assessment of pathological speech — a critical appraisal. Appl Sci (Basel). 2022;12:11095. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122111095

28. Muhammad G, Alhussein M. Convergence of artificial intelligence and internet of things in smart healthcare: a case study of voice pathology detection. IEEE Access. 2021;9:89198-89209. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3090317

29. Liu T, Mao YJ, Dou H, et al. Emerging wearable acoustic sensing technologies. Adv Sci. 2025;12:2408653. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202408653

30. Kim HB, Song J, Park S, et al. Classification of laryngeal diseases including laryngeal cancer, benign mucosal disease, and vocal cord paralysis by artificial intelligence using voice analysis. Sci Rep. 2024;14:9297. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-58817-x

Downloads

Published

2026-07-17

How to Cite

Wiśniewska, E., & Azierski, M. (2026). Artificial intelligence-assisted acoustic voice analysis as a public health tool for screening and triage of laryngeal diseases: a systematic review with qualitative synthesis. Polish Journal of Public Health, 136, 71-75. https://doi.org/10.12923/2083-4829/2026-0015