Retrospective 10-year observation of complications associated with maintaining of catheters in the peritoneal cavity in parients treated with the method of the peritoneal dialysis

Authors

  • Sławomir Mozul Chair and Department of Nephrology, Medical University of Lublin Author
  • Agnieszka Grzebalska Chair and Department of Nephrology, Medical University of Lublin Author
  • Andrzej Książek Chair and Department of Nephrology, Medical University of Lublin Author

Keywords:

peritoneal dialysis, catheters for the peritoneal dialysis, implantation

Abstract

Introduction. Peritoneal dialysis has been applied as the chronic kidney-replacing procedure since the 70s of the 20th century. One of the essential conditions necessary for the appropriate conducting of the therapy of peritoneal dialysis is a correct function of the catheter implanted to the peritoneal cavity. Surgeons usually deal with implantation of catheters in peritoneal dialyses, but also at some centers nephrologists or treatment radiologists perform these. 

Aim. The purpose of the study is presenting own, retrospective observation concerning implantation of catheters in peritoneal dialysis by surgeons and nephrologists. 

Material and methods. Patients with the chronic final kidney failure treated with the method of peritoneal dialysis were subjected to a retrospective analysis of The Department of Nephrology, Medical University of Lublin in the years of 1998-2007. In that period 194 patients were treated with the method of peritoneal dialysis therapy. Catheters were implanted by nephrologists and surgeons. Nephrologists applied Seldinger method for implantation of catheters, surgeons – the so called ‘blind method’. 

Results. In retrospective observation conducted at our centre, it is possible to notice a larger number of catheters implanted by nephrologists in the number of 171, in proportion to the number of catheters established surgically – in the number of 23. A relative majority of the number of complications is also visible in the surgeon’s method although both applied methods are very similar to each other. 

Conclusions. Implantation of the catheter in peritoneal dialyses through the experienced nephrologists is a safe procedure, providing with the valuable, long-term access to the kidney-substitution treatment. 

References

1. Zaman F. Peritoneal dialysis catheter placement by nephrologist. Perit Dial Int 2008;(28):138-41.

2. Wilkie M, Wild J. Peritoneal Dialysis Access – Results from UK Survey. Perit Dial Int 2009;29:355-7.

3. Aakash H Gajjar AH, Rhoden DH, Kathiura P, Kaul R, Udupa AD, Jennings WC. Peritoneal dialysis catheters laparoscopic versus traditional placement techniques and outcomes. Am J Surg 2007;194:872-6.

4. Brunier G, Hiller JA, Drayton S, Pugash RA, Tobe SW. A Change To Radiological Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion: Three-Month Outcomes. Perit Dial Int. 2010;30:534-27.

5. Crabtree JH, Arnold A. Laparoscopic approach under local anesthesia for peritoneal dialysis acces. Perit Dial Int 2000;(20):757-65.

6. Chow KM, Szeto CC, Leung CB, Ching B, Kwan H, Pang WF, Li PK. Tenckhoff Catheter Insertion by Nephrologists: Open Dissecton Technique. Perit Dial Int 2010;30:524-7.

7. Brendan B, McCormick, Bargman JM. Noninfectious compl of peritoneal dialysis: Implications for patients and technique survival. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007;18:3023-5.

8. Asif A, Pflederer TA, Viera CF, Diego J, Roth D, Agarwal A. Does catheter insertion by nephrologist improve peritoneal dialysis utilization? A multicenter analysis. American Society of Diagnostic and Interventional Nephrology Section Editor: Stephen Ash. Seminars in Dialysis 2005;18(2):157-60.

Downloads

Published

2011-01-01