Self-assessment of vocational preparation and plans regarding undertaking employment among bachelor degree physiotherapy students of university-level schools of different educational orientations

Authors

  • Joanna Gotlib Division of Teaching and Outcomes of Education, Faculty of Health Science, Warsaw Medical University Author
  • Katarzyna Prokopowicz Olsztyn College Author
  • Maciej Płaszewski College of Administration in Bielsko-Biała Author
  • Olga Nowotny-Czupryna Silesian Medical University Author
  • Piotr Majcher Division of Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy of Lublin Medical University, Puławy College Author
  • Wojciech Kułak Białystok Medical University Author
  • Joanna Grzegorczyk University of Rzeszów Author
  • Aleksandra Bauer College of Physiotherapy, Wrocław Author
  • Katarzyna Barczyk University School of Physical Education, Wrocław Author
  • Anna Cabak University of Physical Education, Warsaw Author
  • Dariusz Białoszewski Division of Rehabilitation, Department of Physiotherapy, 2nd Medical Faculty, Warsaw Medical University Author
  • Janusz Sierdziński Division of Computer Technology in Medicine and Telemedicine, Warsaw Medical University Author

Keywords:

self-assessment, career plans, vocational preparation, Bachelor degree programmes, physiotherapy, educational orientation of a university-level school

Abstract

Introduction. A major change resulting from the separation of Bachelor- and Master-level studies is that after the completion of the Bachelor-level programme the student obtains a diploma of higher vocational education, i.e. a Bachelor’s degree, and becomes certified to practice the chosen profession. 

Aim. The objective of this study was to analyse the self-assessment of vocational preparation and vocational plans among physiotherapy students during their Bachelor programme studies at university-level schools of different educational orientations and compare self-ratings expressed by students of medical universities (MS), universities of physical education (PE), and other university-level schools (OU) during the first and third year of their Bachelor’s programme. 

Material and methods. The study involved the total of 593 students of 10 Polish universities (4 MS, 2 PE and 4 OU). The study was carried out in March and April 2009 among third-year students. The participation was voluntary. The data collected were the responses to an 88-question anonymous questionnaire designed by the authors. Statistical analyses utilised the chi-squared test (χ2) and the Kruskall-Wallis test at p<0.05 (STATISTICA 8.0 licensed to WUM). 

Results. The participants were most confident about their physical therapy skills (4.01) and least satisfied with their skills in the use of special techniques in physiotherapy (2.72) (p=NS). The students rated their orthopaedic competence as highest (3.56) and rheumatology skills as lowest (3.28). The participants were most confident about their ability to communicate with the patient (4.18) and least satisfied with their skills in communication with other members of the medical team (2.94) (p=NS). 

Conclusions. Students were of high opinion of their knowledge and skills in the area of physiotherapy and its clinical applications that they had gained during their Bachelor-level studies but it is necessary to bear in mind that this was their subjective opinion. The students’ self-assessment differed in the area of general competences such as preparation for conducting research or physical fitness, which could have been influenced by the educational orientations of their university-level schools.

References

1. Ustawa z dn. 27 lipca 2005 r. Prawo o szkolnictwie wyższym (Dz. U. z dnia 30 sierpnia 2005 r.) Dziennik Ustaw z 2005 r. nr 164 poz. 1365.

2. Gotlib J, Białoszewski D, Cabak A, Barczyk K, Bauer A, Grzegorczyk J, Kułak W, Majcher P, Nowotny-Czupryna O, Płaszewski M, Prokopowicz K, Sierdziński J. Postrzeganie zawodu fizjoterapeuty przez studentów I roku studiów I stopnia polskich uczelni o różnych profilach kształcenia. Fizjoterapia Polska 2009;92(4); Vol. 9, 109-21.

3. Gotlib J, Białoszewski D, Cabak A, Barczyk K, Bauer A, Grzegorczyk J, Kułak W, Majcher P, Nowotny-Czupryna O, Płaszewski M, Prokopowicz K, Sierdziński J. Czynniki decydujące o wyborze studiów i wiedza dotycząca możliwości podejmowania pracy w zawodzie fizjoterapeuty wśród studentów różnych typów polskich uczelni. Fizjoterapia Polska 2009; 3(4); Vol. 9, 232-44

4. Zapis stenograficzny (428) z 32. posiedzenia z Senackiej Komisji Zdrowia w dn. 14 października 2008 r. http://www.senat.gov.pl/k7/kom/ kz/2008/032z.htm [9.05.2009]

5. Śliwiński Z. Sprawozdanie z działalności konsultanta krajowego w dziedzinie fizjoterapii za rok 2008 Zgorzelec 2008 r.

6. http://www.ptfodn.livenet.pl/pliki/sprawozdanie%20konsultanta%202008.doc

7. Stan fizjoterapii w województwie mazowieckim. Mazowieckie Centrum Zdrowia Publicznego. Warszawa, listopad 2008 r.] Dostępny pod adresem: http://www.mczp.pl/pdf/stan_fizjoterapii_woj_maz.pdf [17.09.2009]

8. Standardy kształcenia dla kierunku studiów: Fizjoterapia. Załącznik nr 33 Rozporządzenia Ministra Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego z dnia 12 lipca 2007 r. w sprawie standardów kształcenia dla poszczególnych kierunków oraz poziomów kształcenia, a także trybu tworzenia i warunków, jakie musi spełniać uczelnia, by prowadzić studia międzykierunkowe oraz makrokierunki (Dz. U. Nr. 164, poz. 1166).

9. http://www.rgsw.edu.pl/files/active/0/fizjoterapia20070210.doc

10. Ronikier A. 25-lecie pierwszego Wydziału Rehabilitacji Ruchowej w Polsce. Postępy Rehabilitacji 2009; (23) 2: 56-57.

11. Öhman, A, Solomon, P, Finch, E. Career choice and professional preferences in a group of Canadian physiotherapy students Adv Physiother. 2002;4:16-22.

12. Öhman A, Stenlund H, Dahlgren L. Career choice, professional preferences and gender - the case of Swedish physiotherapy students. Adv Physiother. 2001;3:94-107.

13. Öhman A, Hägg, K. Attitudes of novice physiotherapists to their professional role: A gender perspective. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 1998;14(1):23-32.

14. Marie A Johanson, Sex Differences in Career Expectations of Physical Therapist Students Phys ther. 2007;87:1199-211. 15. Rozier CK, Hamilton BL, Hersh-Cochran MS. Gender-based income differences for physical therapist managers. Phys Ther. 1998;78(1):43-51.

16. Rozier CK, Raymond MJ, Goldstein MS, Hamilton BL. Gender and physical therapy career success factors. Phys Ther. 1998;78(7):690-704.

17. Connolly BH, Lupinnaci NS, Bush AJ. Changes in attitudes and perceptions about research in physical therapy among professional physical therapist students and new graduates. Phys Ther. 2001;81(5):1127-34.

Downloads

Published

2010-09-01