Quality of care for pregnant and postpartum women in randomly selected hospitals in Poland
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12923/2083-4829/2025-0007Słowa kluczowe:
perinatal care, obstetrics, parturition, quality of health careAbstrakt
Aim. The purpose of the study was to determine the degree of satisfaction of women giving birth in hospitals in Poland with the quality of perinatal care. Factors such as choice of hospital, possibility of obtaining an epidural, participation of people accompanying women during labor and others were taken into account. The study examined how complications and procedures (such as perineal incision) affected women’s satisfaction with perinatal care.
Material and methods. The survey was conducted online among patients giving birth in facilities across Poland, both public and private. Participation in the survey was offered to a random sample of 309 women who gave birth between 2014 and 2024. A self-administered questionnaire, consisting of closed and open-ended questions, was used for evaluation.
Results. The perinatal care was rated positively by 70.8% of the women surveyed. Among the Polish women surveyed, only 8.3% rated the level of care as bad and 2.1% as very poor . Most respondents gave birth in public hospitals, and only a small percentage in private hospitals (3.2%), so the conclusions drawn in this study apply mainly to public facilities.
Conclusions. The most significant factors in assessing the satisfaction of mothers with the standard of care were the attitude of medical personnel toward patients and the lack of availability of epidural anaesthesia for labor. The quality of perinatal care in Polish hospitals seems satisfactory for most patients, but some issues still need improvement. Care of the pregnant woman should be multilevel and include both physical and psychological aspects, for the overall well-being of mother and child.
Bibliografia
1. Salmanowicz M, Nowicka P, Banach B, Kukowka A. Diagnosis and therapy of gestational diabetes. Farm Pol. 2022;78(5):283-92.
2. Halliday L, Nelson SM, Kearns RJ. Epidural analgesia in labor: A narrative review. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2022;159(2):356-64.
3. Radkowski P, Podhorodecka K, Mirkowicz P. Historia znieczulenia zewnątrzoponowego – położnictwo. Anest Ratown. 2023;17(1):56-60.
4. Wolska W. Znieczulenie zewnątrzoponowe porodu w opinii pacjentek i personelu medycznego. Kraków: Uniwersytet Jagielloński; 2011. [https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/entities/publication/c82676ae-1d98-4c3b-b8c9-6c358f95e2fb]
5. Wąsik S. Wpływ znieczulenia zewnątrzoponowego na przebieg porodu w opinii pacjentek. Kraków: Uniwersytet Jagielloński; 2017. [https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/entities/publication/49aa084d-2015-4453-a61d-b67ec6ccd3a9]
6. Dziób A. Dostępność znieczulenia zewnątrzoponowego do porodu siłami natury - opinia kobiet. Kraków: Uniwersytet Jagielloński; 2017. [https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/entities/publication/865fe1ec-f49f-417d-8cac-3f76aa516bd3]
7. Delimat A. Sposób postrzegania obecności mężczyzn podczas porodu przez kobietę ciężarną. Kraków: Uniwersytet Jagielloński; 2018. [https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/entities/publication/7534d9b9-3573-4d27-b4ac-dc99cfebad11]
8. Skowron Ż. Poziom stresu rodzącej spowodowany brakiem osoby towarzyszącej podczas porodu w okresie pandemii. Kraków: Uniwersytet Jagielloński; 2020. [https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/entities/publication/1126937a-531e-4ac5-a561-a9b9d89a33e1]
9. Madi BC, Sandall J, Bennett R, MacLeod C. Effects of female relative support in labor: A randomized controlled trial. Birth. 1999;26(1):4-8.
10. Shakartzi H, Wenren L, Fernandes S, et al. DREAM: Empowering preclinical medical students with labor support. MedEdPORTAL; 2018.
11. Malhotra T, Thomas S, Arora KS. Impact of medical students on patient satisfaction of pregnant women in labor and delivery triage. Matern Child Health J. 2019;23(11):1467-72;.
12. Woolner A, Cruickshank M. What do pregnant women think of student training? Clin Teach. 2015;12(5):325-30.
13. Romańska A, Baranowska B, Sys D, Węgrzyn P. Wybrane zagadnienia z planu porodu w kontekście oczekiwań kobiet i ich wyników okołoporodowych. Hygeia Public Health. 2019;54(2):123-9.
14. Kubicka-Kraszyńska U, Otffinowska A, Siemińska A, et al. Nacięcie krocza – konieczność czy rutyna? Fundacja Rodzić Po Ludzku. Warszawa; 2010. [https://rodzicpoludzku.pl/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/naciecie_koniecznosc_czy_rutyna2010-1.pdf.]
15. Ćwiek D, Kurkus D, Szymoniak K, et al. Analiza nacięć i obrażeń krocza u rodzących. Pol Przegl Nauk Zdrowiu. 2018;1(54):21-32.
16. WHO recommendations. Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva; 2018.
17. Care in normal birth: a practical guide. Technical Working Group. World Health Organization. Birth (Berkeley, Calif). 1997;24(2):121-3.
18. Chan GJ, Valsangkar B, Kajeepeta S, et al. What is kangaroo mother care? Systematic review of the literature. J Global Health. 2016;6(1).
19. Bajek A, Marcinkowski TJ, Rzempowska J, et al Kangurowanie – zalecany pierwszy bezpośredni kontakt ciała noworodka z ciałem matki. Hygeia Public Health. 2014;49(3):417-20.
20. Lord LG, Harding JE, Crowther CA, et al. Skin-to-skin contact for the prevention of neonatal hypoglycaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23(1):744.
21. Karimi FZ, Sadeghi R, Maleki-Saghooni N, et al. The effect of mother-infant skin to skin contact on success and duration of first breastfeeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;58(1):1-9.
22. Agudelo SI, Gamboa OA, Acuña E, et al. Randomized clinical trial of the effect of the onset time of skin-to-skin contact at birth, immediate compared to early, on the duration of breastfeeding in full term newborns. Int Breastfeed J. 2021;16(1):33.
23. Kristoffersen L, Bergseng H, Engesland H, et al. Skin-to-skin contact in the delivery room for very preterm infants: a randomised clinical trial. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2023;7(1):e001831.
24. Iwanowicz-Palus G, Bogusz R. Opinie młodych matek na temat laktacji i roli położnej w promowaniu karmienia piersią. Raport z badań 2018. [https://oipip.opole.pl/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/aktualnosci_raport_badanie_opinii_mlodych_matek_na_temat_laktacji.pdf]
25. Breastfeeding. WHO; 2018. [https://www.who.int/news-room/facts-in-pictures/detail/breastfeeding]
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2025 Autorzy

Praca jest udostępniana na licencji Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.