Measuring depression as a short-term state and as a trait: multilevel approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12923/2353-8627/2025-0006Keywords:
depression, state, trait, DASS-21, multilevel approachAbstract
Introduction: The Whole Trait Theory allows to conceptualise constructs as a short-term state and as a trait. Depression also can be understood in two ways as a short-term state and as a trait. The aim of the presented study was to verify the factor structure of depression scale at both the inter- and intra-individual levels and to examine the correlation between the density of depression state and depression as a trait.
Material and methods: The study used the depression scale from the DASS-21, and conducted a diary study that lasted 14 days and was based on repeated measurements on a sample of 147 people (49.3% female, 50.7% male). The research was conducted as an online survey, with items displayed in random sequence for each person every day. Respondents reported daily on the intensity of their experience of depression.
Results: A two-level confirmatory factor analysis proved that single-factor structures are the best way to explain the inter- and intra-individual variance of depression. The congeneric reliability for the measurement of depression as a state and as a density of states was high. The correlation between the average measurement of depression as a state and a single measurement of depression as a trait was very strong, thus providing empirical evidence of the Whole Trait Theory.
Conclusions: The present study opens new possibilities for measuring depression in research and clinical practice using repeated measurements of depression as a state. The study of the dynamics of changes in depression states allows for more precise prediction of a person's tendency to experience depression.
References
1. Spielberger C.D. State-Trait Depression Scales (Form X-1). Palo Alto, CA; Mind Garden: 1995.
2. Ritterband L.M., Spielberger C.D. Construct validity of the Beck Depression Inventory as a measure of state and trait depression in nonclinical populations. Depression and Stress. 1996; 2: 123-145.
3. Mayerl H., Schultz A., Freidl W., Stolz E. Short-term dynamics of loneliness and depressive symptoms: Gender differences in older adults. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2024; 123: 105423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2024.105423
4. Nezlek J. B. A multilevel framework for understanding relationships among traits, states, situations, and behaviors. Eur J Pers. 2007; 21: 789-810. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.640
5. Fleeson W., Jayawickreme E. Whole trait theory. J Res Pers. 2015; 56: 82-92.
6. Allen B. P., Potkay C. R. On the arbitrary distinction between states and traits. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1981; 41(5): 916-928. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.5.916
7. Chaplin W. F., John O. P., Goldberg L. R. Conceptions of states and traits: Dimensional attributes with ideals as prototypes. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988; 54(4): 541-557. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.541
8. Fridhandler B. M. Conceptual note on state, trait, and the state-trait distinction. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986; 50(1): 169-174. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.1.169
9. Zuckerman M. The Distinction Between Trait and State Scales Is Not Arbitrary: Comment on Allen and Potkay's 'On the Arbitrary Distinction Between Traits and States'. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1983; 5: 1083-1089. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.5.1083
10. Spielberger C. D. Cross-cultural assessment of emotional states and personality traits. Eur Psychol. 2006; 11: 297-303. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.11.4.297
11. Steyer R., Mayer A., Geiser C., Cole D. A. A theory of states and traits. Revised. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2015; 11(1): 71-98. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153719
12. Fleeson W. Toward a structure- and process- integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001; 80(6): 1011-1027. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.1011
13. Fleeson W., Furr R.M., Jayawickreme E., Helzer E.G., Hartley A.G., Meindl P. Personality science and the foundations of character. W: Miller C.B., Furr R.M., Knobel A., Fleeson W. red., Character: New directions from philosophy, psychology, and theology. Oxford; Oxford University Press: 2015: 41-71. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190204600.003.0003
14. Horstmann K. T., Rauthmann J. F., Sherman R. A., Ziegler M. Unveiling an exclusive link: Predicting behavior with personality, situation perception, and affect in a preregistered experience sampling study. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021; 120(5): 1317-1343. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000357
15. Rauthmann J. F., Horstmann K. T., Sherman R. A. Do self-reported traits and aggregated states capture the same thing? A nomological perspective on trait-state homomorphy. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2019; 10(5): 596-611. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618774772
16. Fleeson W., Gallagher P. The implications of Big Five standing for the distribution of trait manifestation in behavior: Fifteen experience-sampling studies and a meta-analysis. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009; 97(6): 1097-1114. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016786
17. Nübold A., Hülsheger U. R. Personality states mediate the effect of a mindfulness intervention on employees' work outcomes: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Pers. 2021; 35(4): 646-664. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070211012915
18. Finnigan K. M., Vazire S. The incremental validity of average state self-reports over global self-reports of personality. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018; 115(2): 321-337. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/djknb
19. Fleeson W., Leicht C. On delineating and integrating the study of variability and stability in personality psychology: Interpersonal trust as illustration. J Res Pers. 2006; 40(1): 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.004
20. Zuroff D. C., Sadikaj G., Kelly A. C., Leybman M. J. Conceptualizing and measuring self-criticism as both a personality trait and a personality state. J Pers Assess. 2016; 98(1): 14-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1044604
21. Ohly S., Sonnentag S., Niessen C., Zapf D. Diary studies in organizational research: An introduction and some practical recommendations. J Pers Psychol. 2010; 9(2): 79-93. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000009
22. Hektner J.M., Schmidt J.A., Csikszentmihalyi M. Experience sampling method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. Thousand Oaks, CA; Sage: 2007.
23. Chisholm D., Sweeny K., Sheehan P., Rasmussen B., Smit F., Cuijpers P., Saxena S. Scaling-up treatment of depression and anxiety: a global return on investment analysis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016; 3(5): 415-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(16)30024-4
24. World Health Organization. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. 11th Ed. Geneva; World Health Organization: 2019.
25. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. Arlington, VA; American Psychiatric Association; 2013. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
26. Teasdale J. D. Cognitive vulnerability to persistent depression. Cogn Emot. 1988; 2: 247-274.
27. Haaga D. A., Beck A. T. Perspectives on depressive realism: Implications for cognitive theory of depression. Behav Res Ther. 1995; 33(1): 41-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(94)e0016-c
28. Dumenci L., Windle M. A latent trait-state model of adolescent depression using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale. Multivariate Behav Res. 1996; 31: 313-330. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3103_3
29. Altweck L., Freund J., Hahm S., Schmidt S., Tomczyk S. Collective loneliness: The impact of the social network on loneliness and depression during the coronavirus pandemic in older Europeans. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2024; 39(1): e6045. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.6045
30. Di Blas L., Borella M., Ferrante D. Short-term effects of fluctuations in self-esteem, perceived stress and loneliness on depressive states. Psihologijske Teme. 2021; 30(1): 99-114. https://doi.org/10.31820/pt.30.1.5
31. Krohne H. W., Schmukle S. C., Spaderna H., Spielberger C. D. The State-Trait Depression Scales: An International Comparison. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2002; 15(2): 105-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800290028422
32. Vera-Villarroel P., Buela-Casal G., Celis-Atenas K., Córdova-Rubio N., Encina-Olea N., Spielberger C. D. Chilean experimental version of the State-Trait Depression Questionnaire (ST-DEP): Trait sub-scale (T-DEP). Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2008; 8(2): 563-575. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.106.1.65-77
33. Lovibond S.H., Lovibond P.F. Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales. 2nd ed. Sydney; Psychology Foundation: 1995. https://doi.org/10.1037/t01004-000
34. Clark L. A., Watson D. Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. J Abnorm Psychol. 1991; 100(3): 316-336. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843x.100.3.316
35. Lovibond P. F., Lovibond S. H. The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995; 33(3): 335-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-u
36. Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) [strona domowa w Internecie]. Sydney: University of New South Wales; 2007 [aktualizowana 5 marca 2007; cytowana 22 marca 2025]. Dostępna z: http://www2.psy.unsw.edu.au/dass
37. Gomez R., Stavropoulos V., Griffiths M. D. Confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory structural equation modelling of the factor structure of the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scales-21. PLoS ONE. 2020; 15: e0233998. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233998
38. González-Rivera J. A., Pagán-Torres O. M., Pérez-Torres E. M. Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS-21): construct validity problem in Hispanics. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2020; 10: 375-389. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe10010028
39. Park S. H., Song Y. J., Demetriou E. A., Pepper K. L., Thomas E. E., Hickie I. B., et al. Validation of the 21-item Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales (DASS21) in individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2020; 291: e113300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113300
40. Randall D., Thomas M., Whiting D., McGrath A. Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): factor structure in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2017; 32: 134-144. https://doi.org/10.1097/htr.0000000000000250
41. Antony M. M., Bieling P. J., Cox B. J., Enns M. W., Swinson R. P. Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the depression anxiety stress scales in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychol Assess. 1998; 10(2): 176-181. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.10.2.176
42. Patias N. D., Machado W. L., Bandeira D. R., Dell’Aglio D. D. Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS21) – Short Form: Adaptação e Validação para Adolescentes Brasileiros. Psico-USF. 2016; 21(3): 459-469. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712016210302
43. Kyriazos T. A., Stalikas A., Prassa K., Yotsidi V. Can the depression anxiety stress scales short be shorter? Factor structure and measurement invariance of DASS-21 and DASS-9 in a Greek, non-clinical sample. Psychol. 2018; 9: 1095-1127. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2018.95069
44. Lee E. H., Moon S. H., Cho M. S., Park E. S., Kim S. Y., Han J. S., et al. The 21-item and 12-item versions of the depression anxiety stress scales: psychometric evaluation in a Korean population. Asian Nurs Res. 2019; 13: 30-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2018.11.006
45. Makara-Studzińska M., Tyburski E., Załuski M., Adamczyk K., Mesterhazy J., Mesterhazy A. Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Three Versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS¬42, DASS-21, and DASS-12) in Polish Adults. Front Psychiatr. 2022; 12: e770532. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.770532
46. Syahputra Y., Hafni M., Solihatun S., Istiana I., Rahmat C. P., Karisma S. P., Erwinda L. Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the DASS-18 Scale for Assessment of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Symptoms. Madania J Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman. 2024; 14(1): 17-25.
47. Henry J. D., Crawford J. R. The 21-item version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): Normative data and psychometric evaluation in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol. 2005; 44: 227-239. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466505x29657
48. Kline R.B. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 4th ed. New York; Guilford Publications: 2016.
49. Muthén L.K., Muthén B.O. Mplus user’s guide. 7th ed. Los Angeles; Muthén & Muthén: 2015.
50. Hu L., Bentler P. M. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol Methods. 1998; 3(4): 424-453. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.424
51. Sherman R. A., Rauthmann J. F., Brown N. A., Serfass D. G., Jones A. B. The independent effects of personality and situations on real-time expressions of behavior and emotion. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015; 109: 872-888. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000036
52. Su R., Stoll G., Rounds J. The nature of interests: Toward a unifying theory of trait-state interest dynamics. In: Vocational interests in the workplace. Routledge; 2019: 11-38. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315678924-2
53. Baird B. M., Le K., Lucas R. E. On the nature of intraindividual personality variability: Reliability, validity, and associations with well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006; 90(3): 512-527. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.512
54. Clifton A., Kuper L. E. Self-reported personality variability across the social network is associated with interpersonal dysfunction. J Pers. 2011; 79(2): 359-390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00686.x
55. McCabe K. O., Fleeson W. What is extraversion for? Integrating trait and motivational perspectives and identifying the purpose of extraversion. Psychol Sci. 2012; 23(12): 1498-1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612444904
