Vol. 22 No. 4 (2009), Artykuły
Vol. 22 No. 4 (2009)

Determination of aucubin in aerial parts of Buddleja davidii Franch. using different TLC-detection methods

Artykuły
Published 2009-12-30
Tomasz Baj
Department of Pharmacognosy with Medicinal Plant Laboratory, Medical University of Lublin
Dorota Kołtunowska
Department of Pharmacognosy with Medicinal Plant Laboratory, Medical University of Lublin
Kazimierz Głowniak
Department of Pharmacognosy with Medicinal Plant Laboratory, Medical University of Lublin
Tadeusz Wolski
Department of Pharmacognosy with Medicinal Plant Laboratory, Medical University of Lublin

Abstract

In the present study a quantitative analysis of the content of aucubin in Buddleja davidii Franch. was performed. The experiment was based on the colour reaction between iridoids and 1% solution of 4-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde in ethanol and 36% hydrochloric acid. Iridoids were visualized on the HPTLC plate and their content was measured by means of classical TLC densitometer and videodensitometer. The quantitative determination was carried out comparing peak area or peak height with standard aucubin solution. The classical densitometry resulted in 1.05% (measured from peak height) and 1.21 (measured from peak area) of aucubin in dry mass of aerial parts of Buddleja davidii and was about 10% higher than video densitometry concentrations.

PDF

References

1. Andrzejewska-Golec E.: Farm. Pol. 51, 435, 1995.

2. Biringanine G., Chiarelli M. T., Faes M., Duez P.: Talanta, 69, 418, 2006

3. ChangI. M.: Res. Commun. Mol. Pathol. Pharmacol., 102, 189, 1998.

4. Chen S. B., Liu H. P., Tian R. T. et al: J. Chromatogr., A 1121, 114, 2006.

5. Davini E., Iavarone C., Trogolo C.: Phytochemistry, 25, 2420, 1986.

6. Dinda B., Debnath S., Harigaya Y.: Chem. Pharm. Bull., 55, 159, 2007.

7. Farmakopea Polska VII, URPLWM iPB, Warsaw 2006.

8. Farmakopea Polska VIII, URPLWMiPB, Warsaw 2008.

9. Galvez M., Mar t in-Cordero C., Ayuso M. J.: J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem., 20, 389, 2005.

10. Haznagy-Radnai E., Leber P., Toth E. et al.: J. Planar Chromatogr., 18, 314, 2005.

11. Ho J.N., Lee Y. H., Park J. S. et al.: Biol. Pharm. Bull., 28, 1244, 2005.

12. Jeong H. J., Koo H.N., Na H.J. et al.: Cytokine, 18, 252, 2002.

13. Jurisić R., Debeljak Z., Knazevic S. V. et al.: Z Naturf., 59c, 27, 2004.

14. Kim D.H., Kim B. R., Kim J.Y. et al.: Toxicol. Lett., 114, 181, 2000.

15. Kostecka-Mądalska O., Rymkiewicz A.: Acta Polon. Pharm., 31, 221, 1974.

16. Krzek J., Janeczko Z., Walusiak D. et al.: J Planar Chromatogr., 15, 197, 2002.

17. Lee D. H., Cho I. G., Park M. S. et al.: Arch. Pharm. Res., 24, 55, 2001.

18. Nieminen M., Suomi J., Van Nouhuys S. et al.: J. Chem. Ecol., 29, 823, 2003.

19. Matysik G., Toczołowski J.: Chem. Anal., 42, 221, 1997.

20. Ortiz de Urbina A. V., Mar t in M. L., Fernandez B. et al.: Planta Med., 60, 512, 1994.

21. Park K. S., Chang I. M.: Planta Med., 70, 778, 2004.

22. Recio M. C., Giner R. M., Manez S. et al.: Planta Med., 60, 232, 1994.

23. Sesterhenn K., Dist l M., Wink M.: Plant Cell Rep., 26, 365, 2007.

24. Suomi J., Siren H., Hartonen K. et al.: J. Chromatogr., A 868, 73, 2000.

25. Suomi J., Wiedmer S.K., Jussila M. et al.: Electrophoresis, 22, 2580, 2001.

26. Świątek L., Drużyński J.: Acta Polon. Pharm., 6, 597, 1968.

27. Trim A. R., Hill R.: Biochem. J., 50, 310, 1952.

28. Wagner H., Bladt S.: Plant drug analysis, p.88, Springer, 1996.

29. Wolski T., Pszczoła D., Baj T.: Post. Fitoter., 2, 75, 2006.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.

Copyright (c) 2009 Authors

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.