Monitoring vital signs using early warning scoring system as a part of patient’s safety- revive of the literature

Authors

  • Maria Gorzkowska Wydział Lekarski CM-UJ, Kraków Author

Keywords:

patient safety, early warning scoring system, Early Warning Score

Abstract

MONITORING VITAL SIGNS USING EARLY WARNING SCORING SYSTEM AS A PART OF PATIENT’S SAFETY- REVIVE OF THE LITERATURE

Introduction. Significant advance in medical since has been made over the years but have not improved on the survival patients in-hospital cardiac arrest. The current research shows that many patients in-hospital cardiac arrest is preceded by changes in the values of vital signs for a few hours before cardiac arrest. For that purpose, a wide range of scales for early detection of conditions associated with heart failure, respiratory or central nervous system functioning.

Aim. To assess the need for Polish hospitals in Early Warning Score in patients hospitalized outside the centres, intensive care or supervision by reviewing the latest literature.

Methods. Review of the publication of the last 5 years, in English, using sophisticated electronic databases Pub Med, the Early Warning Score system in adult patients hospitalized outside the centres of intensive care or supervision.

Results. 50 original papers were included in the review. It was shown that EWS systems help to identify the deteriorating patient. There are studies that show that the mortality of patients hospitalized in wards, which is not carried out continuous monitoring of vital signs is greater than in wards holding the intensive monitoring of the number of studies indicates the need for monitoring of vital signs, especially in patients at risk. However, such systems have limits. There are studies that show that lack of proper training of nursing staff and limits the effectiveness of the system. Mentioned most frequently evaluated criteria for assessing a patient in critical condition, such as the number of breaths of <5 or> 36, heart rate <40 or> 140 ud / min, systolic blood pressure below 90 mm Hg, a decrease of 2 points. GCS score or more, repeated or prolonged seizures, as well as any patient whose condition begins to worry us, but it does not meet these criteria.

Conclusions. Better monitoring means better care. However, there is a need for further research on EWS systems in order to better define and understand the issues. Extremely important is education of nursing personnel holding direct patient care.

References

1. Recognizing and responding appropriately to early signs of deterioration in hospitalized patients, National Patient Safety, Nov 2007.

2. Smith GB, Prytherch DR, Schmidt P et al. Hospital-wide physiological surveillance—A new approach to the early identification and management of the sick patient Resuscitation. 2006;71:19—28.

3. Sandroni C, Ferro G, Santangelo S et al. In-hospital cardiac arrest: survival depends mainly on the effectiveness of the emergency response. Resuscitation. 2004;62:291–297.

4. Wytyczne resuscytacji 2010 Polskiej Rady Resuscytacji. Kraków; 2010:280-285.

5. Chamberlain DA, Hazinski MF. Education in Resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2003;59:11-/43.

6. Thompson C, Bucknall T, Estabrookes CA et al. Nurses’ critical event risk assessments: a judgement analysis. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2007;18:601–612.

7. Fullerton JN, Price ChL, Silvey NE et al. Is the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) superior to clinician judgment in detecting critical illness in the pre-hospital environment. Resuscitation. 2012;83:557– 562.

8. Windle J, Williams J. Early warning scores: are they needed in emergency care? Emergency Nurse. 2009;May,17:22-26.

9. Patel MS, Jones MA, Jiggins M et al. Does the use of a ‘‘track and trigger’’ warning system reduce mortality in trauma patients? Injury, Int. J. Care Injured. 2011;42:1455–1459.

10. Rattray JE, Lauder W, Ludwick R et al. Indicators of acute deterioration in adult patients nursed in acute wards: a factorial survey. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 20:723–732.

11. http://www.alert-course.com/course-information/, 20.05.2012.

12. Christensen D, Jensen NM, Maaløe R et al. Nurse-administered early warning score system can be used for emergency department triage. Dan Med Bul 2011;58/6.

13. Moon A, Cosgrove JF, Lea D et al. An eight year audit before and after the introduction of modified early warning score (MEWS) charts, of patients admitted to a tertiary referral intensive care unit after CPR. Resuscitation 2011;82: 150–154.

14. Andrews T, Waterman H. Packaging: a grounded theory of how to report physiological deterioration effectively. Issues and innovations in nursing practice. 2005;473- 483.

15. Ludikhuize J, Smorenburg SM, de Rooij SE et al. Identification of deteriorating patients on general wards; measurement of vital parameters and potential effectiveness of the Modified Early Warning Score. Journal of Critical Care. 2012.

16. Ludikhuize J, de Jonge E, Goossens A. Measuring adherence among nurses one year after training in applying the Modified Early Warning Score and Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation instruments. Resuscitation 2011;82:1428– 1433.

17. McGaughey J, Alderdice F, Fowler R et al. Outreach and Early Warning Systems (EWS) for the prevention of Intensive Care admission and death of critically ill adult patients on general hospital wards, Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group. opublikowano 21.01.2009, 20.05.2012.

18. The „How to guide” Reducing harm for deterioration, Version 1.1 – 12/09/08, www. patientsafetyfirs.nhs.uk, 20.05.2012.

Downloads

Published

2012-05-01