Principles of therapeutic contact: physician-patient
Keywords:
empathy, communication, therapeutic contactAbstract
The ability to communicate with patients is an important element of effective therapy. The quality of a relationship between physician and patient, the way of conveying information, the appropriate choice of words, the amount of time devoted to the patient as well as the nonverbal aspect of communication are all vital to recovery from illness. The high prevalence of chronic diseases, increasing social awareness and growing costs of treatment have created the need for new models of health care, proper of doctor-patient communication signifi cantly contributes to improved therapeutic outcomes and mutual satisfaction. The aim of the research is to discuss the importance of doctor-patient communication for the quality of life of patients. Information with patients receive should be focused and adjusted to both the particular patient population and the individual recipient. In order to ensure optimal treatment outcomes and patient satisfaction, health care professionals must be aware of the peculiarities of diseases, their nature and social stigma as well as the vital problems of the patient. Creation of an appropriate doctor-patient relationship begins with a transmission of information about the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. The way this information is framed must take into consideration the high sensitivity of certain groups to verbal messages. Scientific research suggest that success of the treatment depends on how well informed both the doctor and the patient are. Inherent in creating the appropriate doctor-patient relationship is bioethics, which is an important element in the success of therapeutic intervention.
References
1. Norfolk T, Birdi K, Patterson F. Developing therapeutic rapport: a training validation study. Qual Prim Care. 2009;17(2):99-106.
2. Lin CS, Hsu MY, Chong CF. Differences between emergency patients and their doctors in the perception of physician empathy: implications for medical education. Educ Health. 2008;21(2):144.
3. Selph RB, Shiang J, Engelberg R, Curtis JR, White DB. Empathy and life support decisions in intensive care units. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(9):1311-7.
4. Baile WF, Aaron J. Patient-physician communication in oncology: past, present, and future. Curr Opin Oncol. 2005;17(4):331-5.
5. Garfi nkle CL, Block P. Physicians’ interactions with families of ter- minally ill patients. Fam Med. 1996;28(10):702-7.
6. Heiskell LE, Pasnau RO. Psychological reaction to hospitalization and illness in the emergency department. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 199; 9(1):207-18.
7. Stuart S, Noyes R. Interpersonal psychotherapy for somatizing pa- tients. Psychother Psychosom. 2006;75(4):209-19.
8. Dibbelt S, Schaidhammer M, Fleischer C, Greitemann B. Patient-doc- tor interaction in rehabilitation: the relationship between perceived interaction quality and long-term treatment results. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;76(3):328-35.
9. Broglie M. Therapeutic contract from the perspective of patient’s rights. Internist. 1999;40(11):336-40.
10. Koocher GP. The commerce of professional psychology and the new ethics code. Prof Psychol Res Pr. 1994;25(4):355-61.
11. Ventegodt S. Every contact with the patient should be therapeutic. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2007; 20(6): 323-4.
12. Griffith LJ. Why psychotherapy helps the patient in chronic pain. Psychiatry. 2008;5(12):20-7.
13. Rhead JC. What might psychotherapy have to do with peace? Explore. 2009;5(4):186-93.
14. Itzhar-Nabarro Z, Silberschatz G, Curtis JT. The adjective check list as an outcome measure: Assessment of personality change in psychotherapy. Psychother Res. 2009;15(1):1-11.
15. Weis DA, Schottenbauer MA, Gray SH. Delineating prototypes of training psychotherapy. J Am Acad Psychoanal Dyn Psychiatry. 2009; 37(2):353-63.
