The Role of Familism and the Quality of Sibling Relationships in Predicting Loneliness in Late Adulthood
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12923/2353-8627/2026-0007Keywords:
loneliness, late adulthood, sibling relationships, familismAbstract
Introduction: Researchers generally agree that a sense of loneliness has a detrimental effect on both mental and physical health. Family-related factors, such as familism and the quality of interpersonal relationships between adult siblings, may constitute important psychosocial resources for individuals in late adulthood, protecting them against a decline in well-being. The aim of the study was to determine whether dimensions of familism and the quality of sibling relationships can predict loneliness.
Material and methods: A cross-sectional, quantitative, self-report psychological study was conducted using the CAWI (Computer-Assisted Web Interview) method. The study involved 190 individuals in late adulthood. Three psychological instruments were used: the Familism Scale, the Adult Sibling Relationship Scale, the revised UCLA Loneliness Scale, and a sociodemographic questionnaire.
Results: Predictors of loneliness in both gender groups included individualism and the overall quality of sibling relationships. In men, additional significant predictors were cognitive engagement and family values, such as family support, material success and achievements. The regression model explained a greater proportion of variance in loneliness among men than among women.
Conclusions: The obtained results may serve as a basis for developing recommendations in the area of psychological and psychoeducational support for families in which members of the oldest generation are at risk of mental health disorders. It is particularly important to strengthen older adults sense of self-worth, efficacy and autonomy, as well as to create opportunities for maintaining relationships with adult siblings.
References
1. Peplau LA, Perlman D. Perspectives on loneliness. In: Peplau LA, Perlman D, editors. Loneliness: a sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy. New York: Wiley; 1982. p. 1–18.
2. Schultz N, Moore D. Loneliness: differences across three age levels. J Soc Pers Relat. 1988;5(3):275–84. doi:10.1177/0265407588053001.
3. Heinrich LM, Gullone E. The clinical significance of loneliness: A literature review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2006;26(6):695–718.
4. Weiss RS. Loneliness: the experience of emotional and social isolation. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1973.
5. Wasilewska K. Samotność młodzieży. Bydgoszcz: Wydawnictwo Kujawsko-Pomorskiej Szkoły Wyższej; 2010.
6. Cacioppo JT, Hawkley LC, Ernst JM, Burleson M, Berntson GG, Nouriani B, et al. Loneliness within a nomological net: An evolutionary perspective. J Res Pers. 2006;40(6):1054–1085.
7. Charchut D. Samotność – interdyscyplinarny przegląd definicji. In: Zimny J, editor. Samotność: rzeczywistość czy fikcja. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL; 2013. p. 11–22.
8. Thompson A, Pollet T. An exploratory psychometric network analysis of loneliness scales in a sample of older adults. Curr Psychol. 2024;43(6):5428–42. doi:10.1007/s12144-023-04697-9.
9. Adamczyk K. Samotność w różnych okresach życia. Warszawa: Scholar; 2022.
10. Eurostat. Population projections 2025–2100. Luxembourg: Eurostat; 2025.
11. GUS. Sytuacja demograficzna Polski. Warszawa: GUS; 2024.
12. CBOS. Poczucie samotności wśród Polaków. Warszawa: CBOS; 2024.
13. Czekanowski P. Rodzina w życiu osób starszych i osoby starsze w rodzinie. In: Synak B, editor. Polska starość. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego; 2002. p. 154–68.
14. Cohen S, Wills TA. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol Bull. 1985;98(2):310–357.
15. Sabogal F, Marín G, Otero-Sabogal R, Marín B, Perez-Stable E. Hispanic familism and acculturation: what changes and what doesn’t? Hisp J Behav Sci. 1987;9(4):397–412. doi:10.1177/07399863870094003.
16. Campos B, Ullman J, Aguilera A, Dunkel Schetter C. Familism and psychological health: the intervening role of closeness and social support. Cult Divers Ethn Minor Psychol. 2014;20(2):191–201. doi:10.1037/a0034094.
17. Cahill K, Updegraff K, Causadias J, Korous K. Familism values and adjustment among Hispanic/Latino individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2021;147(9):947–85. doi:10.1037/bul0000336.
18. Ramos D. Exploring the use of familismo to manage depression among elderly Latino women [dissertation]. Minneapolis (MN): Walden University; 2020. Available from: https://scholarworks. waldenu.edu/dissertations/8790
19. Sajjad S, Malik J, Masood M. Intergenerational transition of successful ageing through familism across three nested generations. Br J Dev Psychol. 2025;43(6):1–14. doi:10.1111/bjdp.12562.
20. Stocker C, Gilligan M, Klopack E, Conger K, Lanthier R, Neppl T, et al. Sibling relationships in older adulthood: links with loneliness and well-being. J Fam Psychol. 2020;34(2):224–34. doi:10.1037/fam0000586.
21. Walęcka-Matyja K. Relacje interpersonalne dorosłych rodzeństw. Łódź: Wydawnictwo UŁ; 2018.
22. Gold D. Sibling relationships in old age: a typology. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1989;28(1):37–51. doi:10.2190/VGYX-BRHN-J51V¬0V39.
23. Kasten H. Rodzeństwo: ideały, rywale, powiernicy. Warszawa: PWN; 1997.
24. Khodyakov D, Carr D. The impact of late-life parental death on adult sibling relationships: do parents’ advance directives help or hurt? Res Aging. 2009;31(5):495–519. doi:10.1177/0164027509337193.
25. Merz E, De Jong Gierveld J. Childhood memories, family ties, sibling support and loneliness in ever-widowed older adults: quantitative and qualitative results. Ageing Soc. 2016;36(3):534–61. doi:10.1017/S0144686X14001329.
26. Wąsiński A, Fabiś A, Muszyński M. Strategie radzenia sobie z lękiem egzystencjalnym przez osoby starsze. Dyskursy Młodych Andragogów. 2024;(25):281–303.
27. Freedman V. Family structure and the risk of nursing home admission. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1996;51B(2): S61–
69. doi:10.1093/geronb/51B.2.S61.
28. Kersting R. Impact of social support, diversity, and poverty on nursing home utilization in a nationally representative sample of older Americans. Soc Work Health Care. 2001;33(2):67–87. doi:10.1300/J010v33n02_05.
29. Brzezińska A, Ziółkowska B, Appelt K. Psychologia rozwoju człowieka. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne; 2015.
30. Walęcka-Matyja K. Adult Sibling Familial Relationship Scale (ASFRS) – construction and psychometric properties: preliminary report. Hell J Psychol. 2015;12:172–189.
31. Knight GP, Gonzales NA, Saenz DS, Bonds DD, Germán M, Deardorff J, et al. The Mexican American cultural values scale for adolescents and adults. J Early Adolesc. 2010;30(3):444–481.
32. Walęcka-Matyja K. Adult sibling familial relationship scale (ASFRS) – construction and psychometric properties: preliminary report. Hellenic J Psychol. 2015; 12: 172–189.
33. Kwiatkowska M, Rogoza R, Kwiatkowska K. Analysis of the psychometric properties of the revised UCLA loneliness scale in a Polish adolescent sample. Curr Issues Pers Psychol. 2018;6(2):164–170. doi:10.5114/cipp.2017.69681.
34. Russell D, Peplau LA, Cutrona CE. The revised UCLA loneliness scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1980;39(3):472–80.
35. Szymczak W. Podstawy statystyki dla psychologów: podręcznik akademicki. 3rd ed. Warszawa: Difin; 2018
36. Straś-Romanowska M. Późna dorosłość. In: Czerwińska-Jasiewicz M, Kielar-Turska M, Niemczyński A, Trempała J, editors. Psychologia rozwoju człowieka: podręcznik akademicki. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN; 2011. p. 326–350.
37. Ryff C. Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989;57(6):1069–81. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069.
38. Leszczyńska I., Jeżewska M. Czy wiek późnej dorosłości to kryzys indywidualny i społeczny? In: Bańka A, Balawajder K, Popiołek K, editors. Człowiek w obliczu kryzysów, katastrof i kataklizmów. Warszawa: Stowarzyszenie Psychologia i Architektura; Szkoła Wyższa Psychologii Społecznej; 2012. p. 139–148.
39. Mudyń K, Pietras K. Preferowane wartości a zdrowie i satysfakcja z życia. Psychoterapia. 2007;1(140). Available from: https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/255065
40. Shin H, Park C. Gender differences in social networks and physical and mental health: are social relationships more health protective in women than in men? Front Psychol. 2023;14:1216032. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1216032.
41. Carstensen L, Hershfield H. Beyond stereotypes: using socioemotional selectivity theory to improve messaging to older adults. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2021;30(4):327–334. doi:10.1177/09637214211011468.
42. Knopp K. Czy kobiety naprawdę są bardziej inteligentne emocjonalnie niż mężczyźni? O różnicach międzypłciowych w zakresie zdolności emocjonalnych. Kwart Nauk Fides et Ratio. 2012;4:95–112.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Katarzyna Kamila Walęcka-Matyja, Katarzyna Janiak (Autor)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
